This thread spurred me on enough to follow through with the idea i posted
in SOLR-397 a while back. I've attached a patch to that issue if you want
to try it out...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-397
It adds a "facet.date.include" param that supports the following
options: all,
Thanks,
that's great!
Péter
- Original Message -
From: "gwk"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: date facets without intersections
Hi,
Several possible solutions are discussed in
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Date-Faceting-and-Double-Co
Hi Péter,
There has been a fair amount of discussion on this topic, and there are some
pending things being looked at with regards inclusive/exclusive combinations
etc.
For today, the easiest way to get the results you want to use a granular
time that allows you to specify a non-overlapping perio
Hi,
Several possible solutions are discussed in
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Date-Faceting-and-Double-Counting-td502014.html
Regards,
gwk
On 4/27/2010 10:02 PM, Király Péter wrote:
Dear Solr users,
I am interesting, whether it is possible to get date facets without
intersecting
rang
Grant Ingersoll said:
You should be able to do inclusive/exclusive ranges using the query parser
by
mixing matching brackets [] and braces {}.
See
http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_9_1/queryparsersyntax.html#Range%20Searches
Hi Grant,
Thanks for your answer, but my problem is not that how to q
On Apr 27, 2010, at 4:02 PM, Király Péter wrote:
> Dear Solr users,
>
> I am interesting, whether it is possible to get date facets without
> intersecting
> ranges. Now the documents which stands on boundaries of ranges are covered
> by both ranges. An example:
>
> facet result (from Solr):
>
Dear Solr users,
I am interesting, whether it is possible to get date facets without
intersecting
ranges. Now the documents which stands on boundaries of ranges are covered
by both ranges. An example:
facet result (from Solr):
3
3
12
If we translate into queries, it means that the number of d
