Then the "URL" must be the same.
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Joe Zhang wrote:
> Sorry I didn't make it perfectly clear. The "id" field is URL.
>
> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Joe Zhang wrote:
>
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Xi Shen wrote:
> >
> >> If the va
Sorry I didn't make it perfectly clear. The "id" field is URL.
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Joe Zhang wrote:
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Xi Shen wrote:
>
>> If the value for "id" field is the same, the old entry will be update; if
>> it is new, a new entry will be creat
Thanks!
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Xi Shen wrote:
> If the value for "id" field is the same, the old entry will be update; if
> it is new, a new entry will be created & indexed.
>
> This is my experience. :)
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Joe Zhang wrote:
>
> > Dear list,
> >
> > I
If the value for "id" field is the same, the old entry will be update; if
it is new, a new entry will be created & indexed.
This is my experience. :)
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Joe Zhang wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I just want to confirm an expected behavior of solr:
>
> Assuming we have " id
