By the way, I was using command=indexversion to verify replication is on or
off. Since it seems not reliable, is there a better to do it?
Thanks,
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:43 AM, solr jay wrote:
> You are right. Replication was disabled after the server was restarted, and
> then I saw the behavi
You are right. Replication was disabled after the server was restarted, and
then I saw the behavior. After I added some data, command "indexversion"
returns the right values. So it seems Solr behaved correctly.
Thanks,
2009/8/5 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
> how is the replicationhandler configure
how is the replicationhandler configured? if there was no
commit/optimize thhen it would show the version as '0'
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 5:50 AM, solr jay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://localhost:8549/solr/replication?command=enablereplication
>
> does not seem working. After making the request, I run
>
>
Hi,
http://localhost:8549/solr/replication?command=enablereplication
does not seem working. After making the request, I run
http://localhost:8549/solr/replication?command=indexversion
and here is the response:
0
0
0
0
Notice the indexversion is 0, which is the value after you disable
re
