Re: Filter query + holding previous Facet query counts

2008-07-18 Thread Chris Hostetter
: Is there an easy way to use fq to filter down but retain the overall facet : query counts? I can't seem to find how to accomplish this but seems like a : common item needed for navigating though a result set. I need to do this w/o : holding a session and the counts always seem to reflec

Filter query + holding previous Facet query counts

2008-07-07 Thread Jon Baer
Hi, Is there an easy way to use fq to filter down but retain the overall facet query counts? I can't seem to find how to accomplish this but seems like a common item needed for navigating though a result set. I need to do this w/o holding a session and the counts always seem to re

Re: facet query counts

2007-06-14 Thread Kevin Osborn
oblem. - Original Message From: Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 5:30:04 PM Subject: Re: facet query counts A 32 bit float has about 7 decimal digits of precision, so your range queries actually do overlap since 40f

Re: facet query counts

2007-06-14 Thread Yonik Seeley
A 32 bit float has about 7 decimal digits of precision, so your range queries actually do overlap since 40f is exactly the same as 39f -Yonik On 6/14/07, Kevin Osborn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have a large subset (47640) of my total index. Most of them (45335) have a single

Re: facet query counts

2007-06-14 Thread Mike Klaas
On 14-Jun-07, at 4:29 PM, Kevin Osborn wrote: I have a large subset (47640) of my total index. Most of them (45335) have a single field, which we will call Field1. Field1 is a sfloat. If my query restricts the resultset to my subset and I do a facet count on Field1, then the number of rec

facet query counts

2007-06-14 Thread Kevin Osborn
I have a large subset (47640) of my total index. Most of them (45335) have a single field, which we will call Field1. Field1 is a sfloat. If my query restricts the resultset to my subset and I do a facet count on Field1, then the number of records returned is 47640. And if I sum up the facet co