On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
>
> On 13.11.2010, at 10:30, Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith
>> wrote:
>>> The above wiki page seems to be out of date. Reading the comments in
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2
On 13.11.2010, at 10:30, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith
> wrote:
>> The above wiki page seems to be out of date. Reading the comments in
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236 it seems like "group" should
>> be replaced with "collapse".
>
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> The above wiki page seems to be out of date. Reading the comments in
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236 it seems like "group" should
> be replaced with "collapse".
The Wiki page is not expansive, but I've tried to make it
On 07.11.2010, at 20:13, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am pondering making use of field collapsing. I am currently indexing
> clauses (sections) inside UN documents:
> http://resolutionfinder.org/search/unifiedResults?q=africa&=&t[22]=medication&dc=&st=clause
>
> Now since right now my
Hi,
I am pondering making use of field collapsing. I am currently indexing clauses
(sections) inside UN documents:
http://resolutionfinder.org/search/unifiedResults?q=africa&=&t[22]=medication&dc=&st=clause
Now since right now my data set is still fairly small I am doing field
collapsing in use