Re: field normalization and omitNorms

2008-05-28 Thread Christian Vogler
On Wednesday 28 May 2008 01:37:57 Otis Gospodnetic wrote: If you have tokenized fields of variable size and you want the field length to affect the relevance score, then you do not want to omit norms. Omitting norms is good for fields where length is of no importance (e.g. gender=Male vs.

Re: field normalization and omitNorms

2008-05-28 Thread Mike Klaas
On 27-May-08, at 3:16 PM, Phillip Farber wrote: Hi all, I've been looking without success for a simple explanation of the effect of omitNorms=false for a text field. Can someone point me to the relevant doc? The length of the field, as well as field and document boosts, will not

field normalization and omitNorms

2008-05-27 Thread Phillip Farber
Hi all, I've been looking without success for a simple explanation of the effect of omitNorms=false for a text field. Can someone point me to the relevant doc? What is the effect of omitNorms=false on index size and query performance for say 200K documents that have s single large text

Re: field normalization and omitNorms

2008-05-27 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
per doc per field without norms, I believe. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message From: Phillip Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 6:16:58 PM Subject: field normalization and omitNorms