Re: if we can do that Inverted index and forward information stored on different disks by solr?

2018-09-02 Thread shreck
Thanks ! In fact, if the data reaches the PB level, or higher. It is not realistic to increase the memory. -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html

Re: if we can do that Inverted index and forward information stored on different disks by solr?

2018-08-31 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 8/31/2018 3:19 AM, shreck wrote: thanks , Elasticsearch also dosen't support the feature? in some situation,i think we can improve search performance through this way. I cannot see how it would improve performance. The best way to improve search performance is to add memory to the

Re: if we can do that Inverted index and forward information stored on different disks by solr?

2018-08-31 Thread shreck
thanks , Elasticsearch also dosen't support the feature? in some situation,i think we can improve search performance through this way. -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html

Re: if we can do that Inverted index and forward information stored on different disks by solr?

2018-08-31 Thread Mikhail Khludnev
Nope. You can try to hack DirectoryFactory to make it layout files based on extension. On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 11:58 AM shreck wrote: > > > > > -- > Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html > -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev

if we can do that Inverted index and forward information stored on different disks by solr?

2018-08-31 Thread shreck
-- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html

if we can do that Inverted index and forward information stored on different disks by solr?

2018-08-31 Thread shreck
-- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html