are you boosting your docs?
2011/8/8 Jason Toy
> I am trying to test out and compare different sorts and scoring.
>
> When I use dismax to search for "indie music"
> with: qf=all_lists_text&q="indie+music"&defType=dismax&rows=100
> I see some stuff that seems "irrelevant", meaning in top result
If your want to understand and debug the scoring you can use debugQuery=true
to see how different documents score. Most of the time docs with both terms are
on top of the result set unless norms are interferring.
To understand your should check the Solr relevancy wiki but the Lucene docs
are mu
I am trying to test out and compare different sorts and scoring.
When I use dismax to search for "indie music"
with: qf=all_lists_text&q="indie+music"&defType=dismax&rows=100
I see some stuff that seems "irrelevant", meaning in top results I see only
1 or 2 mentions of "indie music", but when I l
> Dismax queries can. But
>
> sort=termfreq(all_lists_text,'indie+music')
>
> is not using dismax. Apparenty termfreq function can not? I am not
> familiar with the termfreq function.
It simply returns the TF of the given _term_ as it is indexed of the current
document.
Sorting on TF like
> Are not Dismax queries able to search for phrases using the default
> index(which is what I am using?) If I can already do phrase searches, I
> don't understand why I would need to reindex t be able to access phrases
> from a function.
Executing a Lucene phrase query is not the same as term f
Dismax queries can. But
sort=termfreq(all_lists_text,'indie+music')
is not using dismax. Apparenty termfreq function can not? I am not familiar
with the termfreq function.
To understand why you'd need to reindex, you might want to read up on how
lucene actually works, to get a basic understa
Are not Dismax queries able to search for phrases using the default
index(which is what I am using?) If I can already do phrase searches, I
don't understand why I would need to reindex t be able to access phrases
from a function.
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Markus Jelsma wrote:
>
> > Aelexe
> Aelexei, thank you , that does seem to work.
>
> My sort results seem to be totally wrong though, I'm not sure if its
> because of my sort function or something else.
>
> My query consists of:
> sort=termfreq(all_lists_text,'indie+music')+desc&q=*:*&rows=100
> And I get back 4571232 hits.
Tha
On 8/8/2011 4:34 PM, Jason Toy wrote:
> Aelexei, thank you , that does seem to work.
>
> My sort results seem to be totally wrong though, I'm not sure if its because
> of my sort function or something else.
>
> My query consists of:
> sort=termfreq(all_lists_text,'indie+music')+desc&q=*:*&rows=10
Aelexei, thank you , that does seem to work.
My sort results seem to be totally wrong though, I'm not sure if its because
of my sort function or something else.
My query consists of:
sort=termfreq(all_lists_text,'indie+music')+desc&q=*:*&rows=100
And I get back 4571232 hits.
All the results don't
You can use the standard query parser and pass q=*:*
2011/8/8 Jason Toy
> I am trying to list some data based on a function I run ,
> specifically termfreq(post_text,'indie music') and I am unable to do it
> without passing in data to the q paramater. Is it possible to get a sorted
> list wit
I am trying to list some data based on a function I run ,
specifically termfreq(post_text,'indie music') and I am unable to do it
without passing in data to the q paramater. Is it possible to get a sorted
list without searching for any terms?
12 matches
Mail list logo
