=50}fq=_query_:{!geofilt
sfield=location_2 pt=40.51,-5.91 d=500} other_filter:value ..
I write here the query because maybe it *helps* to someone that need to do
something like this ...
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/multiple-spatial-values
.nabble.com/multiple-spatial-values-tp1555668p3117145.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
the query because maybe it *helps* to someone that need to do
something like this ...
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/multiple-spatial-values-tp1555668p3117145.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/multiple-spatial-values-tp1555668p3107445.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 5:56 AM, marthinal jm.rodriguez.ve...@gmail.com wrote:
sfield, pt and d can all be specified directly in the spatial
functions/filters too, and that will override the global params.
Unfortunately one must currently use lucene query syntax to do an OR.
It just makes it
Yeah we use this in production. Yonik: WHat are the performance
implication with doing this? Will the fq be cached?
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 5:56 AM, marthinal jm.rodriguez.ve...@gmail.com
wrote:
sfield, pt and d
?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/multiple-spatial-values-tp1555668p3105521.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:11 PM, marthinal jm.rodriguez.ve...@gmail.com wrote:
Yonik Seeley-2-2 wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:12 PM, dan sutton lt;danbsut...@gmail.comgt;
wrote:
I was looking at the LatLonType and how it might represent multiple
lon/lat
values ... it looks to me like
Hi,
I was looking at the LatLonType and how it might represent multiple lon/lat
values ... it looks to me like the lat would go in {latlongfield}_0_LatLon
and the long in {latlongfield}_1_LatLon ... how then if we have multiple
lat/long points for a doc when filtering for example we choose the
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:12 PM, dan sutton danbsut...@gmail.com wrote:
I was looking at the LatLonType and how it might represent multiple lon/lat
values ... it looks to me like the lat would go in {latlongfield}_0_LatLon
and the long in {latlongfield}_1_LatLon ... how then if we have
10 matches
Mail list logo