39 PM
> To: Wasim S Kazi
> Subject: WELCOME to solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>
> Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> mailing list.
>
> I'm working for my owner, who can be reached at
> solr-user-ow...@lucene.apache.org.
>
: Wasim S Kazi
Subject: WELCOME to solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the solr-user@lucene.apache.org
mailing list.
I'm working for my owner, who can be reached at
solr-user-ow...@lucene.apache.org.
Acknowledgment: I have added the address
25, 2018 at 2:22 AM, wrote:
>
>> Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
>> solr-user@lucene.apache.org mailing list.
>>
>> I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
>> at solr-user-ow...@lucene.apache.org.
>>
>> Acknowledgment:
Hi Solr Team,
We are facing Solr System Configuration issues which needs help. Please let
us know whom to post our Questions/Queries.
Thanks,
Srinivas
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 2:22 AM, wrote:
> Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
> solr-user@lucene.apache.org mailing li
On 7/11/2016 13:50, solr-user-h...@lucene.apache.org wrote:
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
solr-user@lucene.apache.org mailing list.
I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
at solr-user-ow...@lucene.apache.org.
To confirm that you would like
petas...@yahoo
se to
indicate that it's dead.
To make it to the list without human intervention, your message must be
sent from a subscribed address to solr-user@lucene.apache.org. All the
details you need to get subscribed to Solr mailing lists is here:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/resources.html#mailing-lists
Thanks,
Shawn
Hi Carl,
This address is valid, any subscribed user received a copy of your email.
solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Andrea
On 21 May 2016 15:10, "Carl Roberts" wrote:
> And, these response are just weird. Do they mean this user list is
> obsolete? is solr no longer supported via a
ask questions?
On 5/21/16 9:08 AM, solr-user-h...@lucene.apache.org wrote:
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
solr-user@lucene.apache.org mailing list.
I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
at solr-user-ow...@lucene.apache.org.
No information has been provide
And, these response are just weird. Do they mean this user list is
obsolete? is solr no longer supported via a user list where we can ask
questions?
On 5/21/16 9:08 AM, solr-user-h...@lucene.apache.org wrote:
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
solr-user@lucene.apach
I've shared an item with you:
Solr Full Indexing issue
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B7UpFqsS5lSjWEhxRE1NN2tMNTQ&usp=sharing&invite=CJXE8q4O
It's not an attachment -- it's stored online. To open this item, just click
the link above.
Am Tue, 11 Mar 2014 11:10:28 +0100
schrieb "solr-user-h...@lucene.apache.org"
:
> Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
> solr-user@lucene.apache.org mailing list.
>
> I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
> at solr-user-ow...@lucene.apache.
I confirm
.
- Forwarded Message -
From: Rahul Mandaliya
To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 9:38 AM
Subject: Fw: confirm subscribe to solr-user@lucene.apache.org
hi,
i am giving confirmation for subscribtion to solr-user@lucene.apache.org
regards,
Rahul
Am 22.03.2012 23:47, schrieb solr-user-h...@lucene.apache.org:
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
solr-user@lucene.apache.org mailing list.
I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
at solr-user-ow...@lucene.apache.org.
To confirm that you would like
m...
Hi ,
Can I limit the terms that the HighlightComponent uses. My query is
generally long and I want specific ones to be highlighted and the rest is
not highlighted. Is there an option like the SpellCheckComponent. it uses q
unless spellcheck.q if specified. Is a hl.q parameter possible?
Or an
> /spell/?q=built+to+last
>
> so that we can check the spelling. We are not using
> /select?q=built+to+last
>
> Can I use dismax with /spell?
Yes you can.
> I understood from your reply that I need to change my
> schema.xml and modify
> the field types.
Correct. Make them full-text searchable.
Ahmet,
In production system we are using
/spell/?q=built+to+last
so that we can check the spelling. We are not using /select?q=built+to+last
Can I use dismax with /spell?
I understood from your reply that I need to change my schema.xml and modify
the field types.
Do I need to still use the se
> select/?q=built+to+last&defType=dismax&qf=searchFields^0.2+title^20&debugQuery=on
>
> For some reason if I use title field in my query I don't
> get any results.
>
> I am copying all searchable fields into searchFields field.
> So I am able to
> search only in the searchFields field not in any
s not your cause of your problem but omitNorms="true" disables index
> time boosts.
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxQParserPlugin can satisfy your need.
>
>
> --- On Thu, 11/11/10, Solr User wrote:
>
> > From: Solr User
> > Subject: Re: WELCOME to
not your cause of your problem but omitNorms="true" disables index
> time boosts.
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxQParserPlugin can satisfy your need.
>
>
> --- On Thu, 11/11/10, Solr User wrote:
>
>> From: Solr User
>> Subject: Re: WELCOME to so
isables index time
boosts.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxQParserPlugin can satisfy your need.
--- On Thu, 11/11/10, Solr User wrote:
> From: Solr User
> Subject: Re: WELCOME to solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Thursday, November 11, 2010, 1
Eric,
Thank you so much for the reply and apologize for not providing all the
details.
The following are the field definitons in my schema.xml:
Copy Fields:
searchFields
Before creating the indexes I feed XML
There's not much to go on here. Boosting works,
and index time as opposed to query time boosting
addresses two different needs. Could you add some
detail? All you've really said is "it didn't work", which
doesn't allow a very constructive response.
Perhaps you could review:
http://wiki.apache.org/
boosting on a specific field like
title?
Thanks,
Solr User
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:26 AM, wrote:
> Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
> solr-user@lucene.apache.org mailing list.
>
> I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
> at solr-use
Excuse me again... it seems like my mail-provider has changed something. I
hope this message won't pend again.
Thank you.
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/solr-user-lucene-apache-org-tp679673p679684.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
The 3rd turn...
--
GMX.at - Österreichs FreeMail-Dienst mit über 2 Mio Mitgliedern
E-Mail, SMS & mehr! Kostenlos: http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/atfreemail
Hi,
Users pls ignore this mail. I am just sending a test mail to check whether
my user id is okay.
The mails I am sending to this group is bouncing from yesterday.Pls excuse
me for any inconvenience.
Thanks and Rgds,
Mark
(FYI: in the future please start a new thread with an approriate subject
line when you ask questions -- you probably would have gotten a lot more
responses fro people interested in Tika and SolrCell if they could tell
that this email was about SolrCell)
: I found that Tika read the html and ex
Thanks a lot for you response !!
For the first solution :
I need to index all the content of my websites and I want just tika ignore
because I have already an id
I'll try monday and tell you if it works
The second solution :
Are your sure Tika use the HTML Tokenizer ? I'll check
2009/12/5 Ragh
2 ways I can think of ...
- ExtractingRequestHandler (this is what I am guessing you are using now)
Set extractOnly=true while making a request to the extractingRequestHandler
and get the parsed content back. Now make a post request on update request
handler with what ever fields and field val
Hi,
I have a problem with solr. I'm indexing some html content and solr crash
because my id field is multivalued.
I found that Tika read the html and extract metadata like from my htmls but my documents has an already an id setted by
literal.id=10.
I tried to map the id from Tika by fmap.id=igno
e
> From: Jan Buelens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2008 3:37:12 AM
> Subject: Re: WELCOME to solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>
> Hi,
>
> We are currently using Solr as search engine.
> To add an existing web
Nutch
- Original Message
From: Jan Buelens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2008 3:37:12 AM
Subject: Re: WELCOME to solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Hi,
We are currently using Solr as search engine.
To add an existing website to our search eng
currently two approaches:
http://blog.foofactory.fi/2007/02/online-indexing-integrating-nutch-with.html
and:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-442
I have had experience with the former... you may have more luck on the
nutch-user list for help
ryan
Jan Buelens wrote:
Hi,
We are c
Hi,
We are currently using Solr as search engine.
To add an existing website to our search engine, we are investigating Nutch.
Does anyone have more information / experience about an integration between
Solr and Nutch?
Thanks in advance !
Best regards,
Jan
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To confirm that you would like
archive@mail-archive.com
added to the solr-user mailing list, please send
an empty reply to this address:
[EMAI
36 matches
Mail list logo