On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Ed Summers e...@pobox.com wrote:
Here at the Library of Congress we've got several production Solr
instances running v1.3. We've been itching to get at what will be v1.4
and were wondering if anyone else happens to be using it in production
yet. Any information
Pubget has been using 1.4 for a while now to make the replication easier.
http://pubget.com
We compiled a while back and are thinking of updating to the latest build to
start playing with distributed spell checking.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com
Here at the Library of Congress we've got several production Solr
instances running v1.3. We've been itching to get at what will be v1.4
and were wondering if anyone else happens to be using it in production
yet. Any information you can provide would be most welcome.
//Ed
We're using an svn grab of 1.4 in production mostly to get the Java
replication code. We don't have any problems to report.
Here's the version we're using:
1.4-dev 749558:749756M - built on 2009-03-03 at 13:10:05
Thanks for your time!
Matthew Runo
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
Also, see this thread:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/c55ea357cd4749e9/upgrade_to_solr_1_4
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Matthew Runo mr...@zappos.com wrote:
We're using an svn grab of 1.4 in production mostly to get the Java
replication code. We don't have any problems to
We're using recent nightly snapshots of Solr in various applications,
and also our (Lucid's) certified distributions which include many
1.4'ish goodies in a supportable fashion.
So, yeah, I definitely have no qualms about recommending trunk or
nightly builds of Solr. Granted, of course,
I, too, can confirm 1.4 is solid.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: Ed Summers e...@pobox.com
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2009 8:47:26 AM
Subject: solr v1.4 in production?
Here