Yonik
Isee. Thank you for the updates.
On 4/3/2015 12:28 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Ryan Josal rjo...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorting the result set or the facets? For the facets there is
facet.sort=index (lexicographically) and facet.sort=count. So maybe you
are
Yonik,
Are you supporting enum/fc/fcs? Or native lucene faceting?
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Yonik Seeley ysee...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Ryan Josal rjo...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorting the result set or the facets? For the facets there is
facet.sort=index
Is sorting on facet index supported?
I would like to sort on the below facet index
lst name=P_SupplierRanking
int name=014/int
int name=18/int
int name=212/int
int name=3349/int
int name=481/int
int
Ryan Josal rjo...@gmail.com wrote:
So maybe you are asking if you can sort by index, but reversed?
I don't think this is possible, and it's a good question.
It is not currently possible and the JIRA for the issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1672
is 5 years old. On the plus
Sorting the result set or the facets? For the facets there is
facet.sort=index (lexicographically) and facet.sort=count. So maybe you
are asking if you can sort by index, but reversed? I don't think this is
possible, and it's a good question. I wanted to chime in on this one
because I wanted
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Ryan Josal rjo...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorting the result set or the facets? For the facets there is
facet.sort=index (lexicographically) and facet.sort=count. So maybe you
are asking if you can sort by index, but reversed? I don't think this is
possible, and
Awesome, I didn't know this feature was going to add so much power!
Looking forward to using it.
On Thursday, April 2, 2015, Yonik Seeley ysee...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Ryan Josal rjo...@gmail.com
javascript:; wrote:
Sorting the result set or the facets? For the