having troubles understanding the reason for that NPE.
First you could try removing the line #102 in HttpClientUtility so
that logging does not prevent creation of the http client in
SyncStrategy.
--
Sami Siren
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel
Hi,
Why do you want to back up? With enough machines and a decent replication
factor (3 or higher) there is usually little need to back it up. If you have
the space it's better to launch a second cluster in another DC.
You can also choose to increase the number of maxCommitsToKeep but it'll
If reindexing from raw XML files is feasible (less than 30 minutes) it would be
the easiest option. The problem with recovering with old snapshots is that you
have to remove bad indices from all cores and possible stale (or recoveries in
progress) indices and replace it with your snapshot and
, Sep 19, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.io wrote:
Hi,
Since the 2012-09-17 11:10:41 build shards start to have trouble coming
back online. When i restart one node the slices on the other nodes are
throwing exceptions and cannot be queried. I'm not sure how
-Original message-
From:Daisy omnia.za...@gmail.com
Sent: Mon 24-Sep-2012 15:09
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Solr - Remove specific punctuation marks
Yes I am trying to index Arabic document. There is a problem that the
regex couldn't be understood in the
Hi - you need to get rid of all non-character code points.
http://unicode.org/cldr/utility/list-unicodeset.jsp?a=[:Noncharacter_Code_Point=True:]
-Original message-
From:Patrick Oliver Glauner patrick.oliver.glau...@cern.ch
Sent: Tue 25-Sep-2012 18:47
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Hi - on Debian systems there's a /etc/default/tomcat properties file you can
use to set your flags.
-Original message-
From:Benjamin, Roy rbenja...@ebay.com
Sent: Thu 27-Sep-2012 19:57
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: How to run Solr Cloud using Tomcat?
I've gone through
-Original message-
From:Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com
Sent: Mon 01-Oct-2012 17:58
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: quot;Indexed without position dataquot; - strange exception in
eDisMax (Solr 4.0beta)
I am getting a very strange exception when I use edismax
Hi Varun,
Running many Zookeeper instances improves read time but has a negative impact
on writing states to Zookeeper. Having a node only talk to the local Zookeeper
instance limits availability, your Zookeeper daemon will die at some point and
that will cut off your Solr node from the entire
The problem is your stray double quote:
str name=queryAnalyzerFieldTypetext_general_fr/str
I'd think this would throw an exception somewhere.
-Original message-
From:Jose Aguilar jagui...@searchtechnologies.com
Sent: Tue 02-Oct-2012 01:40
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject:
No, not in the schema but in the solrconfig. Look for your request handler such
as the default:
requestHandler name=/select class=solr.SearchHandler
you can add a default value for the sort parameter
str name=sortfield desc/str
-Original message-
From:A Geek dw...@live.com
Hi - You should stick to Nutch' schema.xml and not manually add a text or body
field that aren't going to be populated anyway. Nutch sends data, by default,
to the content field.
-Original message-
From:Rafał Kuć r@solr.pl
Sent: Tue 09-Oct-2012 14:32
To:
Hi - The WordDelimiterFilter can help you get *-BAAN-* for A100-BAAN-C20 but
only because BAAN is surrounded with characters the filter splits and combines
upon.
-Original message-
From:Kissue Kissue kissue...@gmail.com
Sent: Wed 10-Oct-2012 14:20
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Hi - the wiki page will get you up and running quickly:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/OpenNLP
-Original message-
From:ahmed ahmed.missaoui...@gmail.com
Sent: Thu 11-Oct-2012 13:32
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: SLOR And OpenNlp integration
Hello,
I am a new user of
Hi - combining two stemmers in one filter chain will lead to unexpected
results. It's best to define to different text_ fields even though you'd like
to avoid setting this up. It's not very hard. You can even use the LandID
update processor to sent spanish text to a spanish field and there
Hi - Regex is not available in Solr 3.6:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2604
-Original message-
From:Daisy omnia.za...@gmail.com
Sent: Tue 23-Oct-2012 14:13
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr - Use Regex in the Query Phrase
Hi;
I am working with
Hi,
We're testing a 10 node cluster running trunk and write a few million documents
to it from Hadoop. We just saw a node die for no apparent reason. Tomcat was
completely dead before it was automatically restarted again. Indexing failed
when it received the typical Internal Server Error. The
Hi,
I checked the logs and it confirms the error is not fatal, it was logged just a
few seconds before it was restarted. The node runs fine after it was restarted
but logged this non fatal error replayed the log twice. This leaves the
question why it died, there is no log of it dying anywhere.
crash (on the next startup).
Yes, the node recovered itself in the minutes after the exception and continued
to run fine. At least other users can now google for the error and ignore it
for now.
Thanks!
- Mark
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.io wrote
Hi,
One trick is to index a special token at the beginning of the content and do a
phrase query for your terms and the special token with little or no slop. You
can also use Lucene's SpanFirstQuery but it's not yet exposed in Solr. There's
a patch for trunk exposing the SpanFirstQuery in
Hi,
We want to remove some results from the result set based on the result of some
algorithms on some fields in adjacent documents. For example, if doc2 resembles
or doc1 we want to remove it. We cannot do this in a search component because
of problems with paging, maintaining rows=N results
Hi - Detach it from the terminal: java -jar start.jar
-Original message-
From:zakari mohammed metzaka...@yahoo.com
Sent: Mon 29-Oct-2012 15:22
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Having problem runing apache-solr on my linux server
hello dear,
I try running
Hi,
Since yesterday we're unable to build trunk and also a clean check out from
trunk. We can compile the sources but not the example or dist.
It hangs on resolve and after a while prints the following:
resolve:
[ivy:retrieve]
[ivy:retrieve] :: problems summary ::
[ivy:retrieve]
will download a bunch of jars...
FWIW,
Erick
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.io wrote:
Hi,
Since yesterday we're unable to build trunk and also a clean check out
from trunk. We can compile the sources but not the example or dist.
It hangs
Hi,
We're testing again with today's trunk and using the new Lucene 4.1 format by
default. When nodes are not restarted things are kind of stable but restarting
nodes leads to a lot of mayhem. It seems we can get the cluster back up and
running by clearing ZK and restarting everything (another
Ah, we're also seeing Solr lookup an unexisting directory:
2012-10-30 16:32:26,578 ERROR [handler.admin.CoreAdminHandler] -
[http-8080-exec-2] - : IO error while trying to get the size of the
Directory:org.apache.lucene.store.NoSuchDirectoryException: directory
again? Of course
your next build will download a bunch of jars...
FWIW,
Erick
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.io wrote:
Hi,
Since yesterday we're unable to build trunk and also a clean check out
from trunk. We can compile the sources
Hi,
Besides replication issues (see other thread) we're also seeing these warnings
in the logs on all 10 nodes and for all cores using today's or yesterday's
trunk.
2012-10-31 11:01:03,328 WARN [solr.core.CachingDirectoryFactory] - [main] - :
No lockType configured for
That's 5, the actual trunk/
-Original message-
From:Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com
Sent: Wed 31-Oct-2012 16:29
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: No lockType configured for NRTCachingDirectory
By trunk do you mean 4X or 5X?
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Markus
on the leader is corrupt, and that should not happen even on
power loss. Any hints?
Thanks
Markus
-Original message-
From:Markus Jelsma markus.jel...@openindex.io
Sent: Wed 31-Oct-2012 14:14
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Markus Jelsma markus.jel...@openindex.io
Subject: RE: trunk
Hi,
Using this week's trunk we sometime see nodes entering a some funky state where
it continuously reports exceptions. Replication and query handling is still
possible but there is an increase in CPU time:
2012-11-01 09:24:28,337 INFO [solr.core.SolrCore] - [http-8080-exec-4] - :
Hi,
We use trunk but got SolrJ 4.0 from Maven. Creating an instance of
CloudSolrServer fails because its constructor calls a not existing LBServer
constructor, it attempts to create an instance by only passing a HttpClient.
How is LBHttpSolrServer supposed to work without passing a SolrServer
I assume you're using Nutch 2.x? Nutch 1.x does not have such an option and i
find it strange to hear 2.x does. It really makes no sense to have a -reindex
option and it should be removed. I'd recommend to stick to plain indexing.
-Original message-
From:Jack Krupansky
You can use boost queries to boost documents that match some query e.g.
suffix:co.uk but you'll need to have URL suffixes indexed. Nutch knows about
URL suffixes but does not index them. You would need to add a custom indexing
filter or patch an existing filter to add a suffix field. URLUtil
Always check the javadocs. There's a lot of info to be found there:
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_0_0-BETA/analyzers-common/org/apache/lucene/analysis/miscellaneous/LimitTokenCountFilterFactory.html
-Original message-
From:alx...@aim.com alx...@aim.com
Sent: Tue 23-Apr-2013 21:06
DF uses maxDoc which is updated when segments merge so DF is almost never
accurate in a dynamic index.
-Original message-
From:Furkan KAMACI furkankam...@gmail.com
Sent: Thu 02-May-2013 14:05
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: DF is not updated when a document is marked for
Distributed deduplication does not work right now:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3473
We've chosen not do use update processors for deduplication anymore and rely on
several custom mapreduce jobs in Nutch and some custom collectors in Solr to do
some on-demand online deduplication.
hi - this is a known issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4479
-Original message-
From:meghana meghana.rav...@amultek.com
Sent: Tue 07-May-2013 14:28
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: How to get Term Vector Information on Distributed Search
Hi,
I am using
Hi - they are indexed by default but can be omitted since 3.4:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#Common_field_options
-Original message-
From:KnightRider ksu.wildc...@gmail.com
Sent: Tue 07-May-2013 14:41
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr 1.4 - Proximity Search -
Hi,
It uses the StandardAnalyzer which does split on IDEOGRAPHIC SPACE.
Cheers,
Markus
-Original message-
From:Bernd Fehling bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de
Sent: Mon 13-May-2013 13:36
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: CJK question
A question about CJK, how will U+3000
Hi,
The wiki mentions to use the removed position filter at query time for the Thai
language. How is it supposed to work now without the position filter?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LanguageAnalysis#Thai
Thanks,
Markus
forceMerge is very useful if you delete a significant portion of an index. It
can take a very long time before any merge policy decides to finally merge them
all away, especially for a static or infrequently changing index. Also, having
a lot of deleted docs in the index can be an issue if your
Jack,
I'd prefer tons of information instead of a meager 300 page book that leaves a
lot of questions. I'm looking forward to a paperback or hardcover book and
price doesn't really matter, it is going to be worth it anyway.
Thanks,
Markus
-Original message-
From:Jack Krupansky
Hi,
Any intelligent suggestions for this issue?
Thanks,
Markus
-Original message-
From:Trey Hyde th...@centraldesktop.com
Sent: Mon 11-Mar-2013 21:44
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: PostingsHighlighter and analysis
debug=timing has told me for a very long time that 99%
You can use Apache Nutch to crawl local file systems as well and indexing to
Solr as one would otherwise do.
Cheers
-Original message-
From:Sourabh107 sourabh.jain@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday 23rd June 2013 17:12
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr File System Search
I
colons need to be escaped
cheers
-Original message-
From:aniljayanti aniljaya...@yahoo.co.in
Sent: Tuesday 2nd July 2013 12:35
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: undefined field http:// while searchi query
Hi,
I am using solr 3.3 version. After indexing I am querying
hi - check the examples for range queries and date math:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrQuerySyntax
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/4_3_1/solr-core/org/apache/solr/util/DateMathParser.html
-Original message-
From:Marcos Mendez mar...@aimrecyclinggroup.com
Sent: Wednesday 10th July
Remove the WDF from the analysis chain, it's not going to work with multiple
tokens.
-Original message-
From:Furkan KAMACI furkankam...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday 17th July 2013 11:55
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Why quot;Sortquot; Doesn't Work?
I run a query at my
Work?
Hi Markus;
This is default schema at Nutch. Do you mean there is a bug with schema?
2013/7/17 Markus Jelsma markus.jel...@openindex.io
Remove the WDF from the analysis chain, it's not going to work with
multiple tokens.
-Original message-
From:Furkan KAMACI
? It is not listed at schema. Is it document boost?
2013/7/17 Markus Jelsma markus.jel...@openindex.io
No, there is no bug in the schema, it is just an example and provides the
most common usage only; sort by score.
-Original message-
From:Furkan KAMACI furkankam...@gmail.com
You must implement a SpanFirst query yourself. These are not implemented in any
Solr query parser. You can easily expand the (e)dismax parsers and add support
for it.
-Original message-
From:Anatoli Matuskova anatoli.matusk...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday 18th July 2013 11:54
To:
You'll need the import org.apache.lucene.search.spans package in Solr's
ExtendedDismaxQParserPlugin and add SpanFirstQuery's to the main query.
Something like:
query.add(new SpanFirstQuery(new SpanTermQuery(field, clause), distance),
BooleanClause.Occur.SHOULD);
-Original message-
Not your updateHandler, that only shows number about what it's doing and it can
be restarted. Check your cores:
host:port/solr/admin/cores
-Original message-
From:Furkan KAMACI furkankam...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday 18th July 2013 15:46
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re:
count of how many documents indexed
and how many documents updated?
Hi Markus;
It doesn't give me how many documents updated from last commit.
2013/7/18 Markus Jelsma markus.jel...@openindex.io
Not your updateHandler, that only shows number about what it's doing and
it can
Hi - What kind of support would you expect Solr to provide? IDN is only about
conversion between Unicode in your address bas and ASCII in the DNS.
-Original message-
From:Furkan KAMACI furkankam...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday 19th July 2013 11:09
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject:
includes that word: *çorba.*
2013/7/19 Markus Jelsma markus.jel...@openindex.io
Hi - What kind of support would you expect Solr to provide? IDN is only
about conversion between Unicode in your address bas and ASCII in the DNS.
-Original message-
From:Furkan KAMACI furkankam
It is possible: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4260
I rarely see it and i cannot reliably reproduce it but it just sometimes
happens. Nodes will not bring each other back in sync.
-Original message-
From:Neil Prosser neil.pros...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday 22nd July 2013
You should increase your ZK time out, this may be the issue in your case. You
may also want to try the G1GC collector to keep STW under ZK time out.
-Original message-
From:Neil Prosser neil.pros...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday 22nd July 2013 14:38
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject:
Hi - No but there are two unresolved issues about this topic:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4411
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4411
Cheers
-Original message-
From:Jérôme Étévé jerome.et...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday 23rd July 2013 12:58
To:
Eeh, here's the other one: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1712
-Original message-
From:Markus Jelsma markus.jel...@openindex.io
Sent: Tuesday 23rd July 2013 13:18
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: facet.maxcount ?
Hi - No but there are two unresolved
Because it's a get and not a search handler. It takes the id parameter and
returns the latest stored fields of document with the specified ID.
-Original message-
From:Furkan KAMACI furkankam...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday 24th July 2013 11:07
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject:
Hi - To make this work you'll need a homepage flag and some specific hostname
analysis and function query boosting. I assume you're still using Nutch so
getting detecting homepages is easy using NUTCH-1325. To actually get the
homepage flag in Solr you need to modify the indexer to ingest the
This file is malformed:
*SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Unexpected character ''
(code 60) expected '='*
* at [row,col {unknown-source}]: [20281,18]*
Check row 20281 column 18
-Original message-
From:Vineet Mishra clearmido...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday 31st July 2013
Did you also test indexing speed? With default G1GC settings we're seeing a
slightly higher latency for queries than CMS. However, G1GC allows for much
higher throughput than CMS when indexing. I haven't got the raw numbers here
but it is roughly 45 minutes against 60 in favour of G1GC!
Load
Hi,
I have a few very large configuration files but it doens't work in cloud mode
due to the KeeperException$ConnectionLossException. All 10 Solr nodes run trunk
and have jute.maxbuffer set to 5242880 (5MB). I can confirm it is set properly
by looking at the args in the Solr GUI. All
wondering if your setup would work with, say, 2M
configs as a check that it's something else rather than just the 1M limit.
FWIW,
Erick
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.iowrote:
Hi,
I have a few very large configuration files but it doens't work
of 1M
for ZK files, and I'm wondering if your setup would work with, say, 2M
configs as a check that it's something else rather than just the 1M limit.
FWIW,
Erick
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.iowrote:
Hi,
I have a few very
Perhaps it's not the correct tool here but decompounding using a simple
dictionary decompounder token filter will fix this problem.
-Original message-
From:Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com
Sent: Saturday 3rd August 2013 13:33
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re:
Yes, you can copyField the source's contents to another field, use the
KeepWordTokenFilter to keep only those words you really care about. Using
(e)dismax you can then apply a heavy boost on the field. All special words in
that field will show up higher if queried for.
-Original
limit.
FWIW,
Erick
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.iowrote:
Hi,
I have a few very large configuration files but it doens't work in cloud
mode due to the KeeperException$ConnectionLossException. All 10 Solr
Try the TermsComponent. It will return one or more terms and their counts for a
given field only.
-Original message-
From:danielitos85 danydany@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday 14th August 2013 11:30
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: get term frequency, just only keywords
Why? Using terms.limit or a ^term$ regex should limit the response to the exact
term right?
-Original message-
From:danielitos85 danydany@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday 14th August 2013 12:20
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: get term frequency, just only keywords search
I am not entirely sure but the Suggester's FST uses prefixes so you may be able
to prefix the value you otherwise use for the filter query when you build the
suggester.
-Original message-
From:Greg Preston gpres...@marinsoftware.com
Sent: Tuesday 20th August 2013 20:00
To:
Hi Tom,
Don't set it as attributes but as lists as Solr uses everywhere:
similarity class=solr.SchemaSimilarityFactory
bool name=discountOverlapstrue/bool
/similarity
For BM25 you can also set k1 and b which is very convenient!
Cheers
-Original message-
From:Tom Burton-West
Yes, discountOverlaps is used in computeNorm which is used at index time. You
should see a change after reindexing.
Cheers,
Markus
-Original message-
From:Tom Burton-West tburt...@umich.edu
Sent: Thursday 22nd August 2013 23:32
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to
You may be more interested in the ConcatFieldUpdateProcessorFactory:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/4_1_0/solr-core/org/apache/solr/update/processor/ConcatFieldUpdateProcessorFactory.html
-Original message-
From:Alok Bhandari alokomprakashbhand...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday 27th August
Hi
-Original message-
From:Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org
Sent: Wednesday 28th August 2013 0:50
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: SOLR 4.2.1 - High Resident Memory Usage
On 8/27/2013 4:17 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
Ok, this whole topic usually gives me heartburn. So
Hi - You're going to miss unstored but indexed fields. We stop any indexing
process, kill the servlets on the down DC and copy over the files using scp,
then remove the lock file and start it up again. Always works but it's a manual
process at this point but should be easy to automate using
Hi - it's certainly not a rule of thumb but usually RES always grows higher
than Xmx so keep an eye on it.
-Original message-
From:vsilgalis vsilga...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday 28th August 2013 2:53
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: SOLR 4.2.1 - High Resident Memory Usage
Hi Mark,
Got an issue to watch?
Thanks,
Markus
-Original message-
From:Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday 4th September 2013 16:55
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: SolrCloud 4.x hangs under high update volume
I'm going to try and fix the root cause for
-Original message-
From:maephisto my_sky...@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday 11th September 2013 14:34
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Dynamic analizer settings change
Thanks, Erik!
I might have missed mentioning something relevant. When querying Solr, I
wouldn't
-Original message-
From:Furkan KAMACI furkankam...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday 22nd September 2013 21:15
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Near Duplicate Document Detection at Solr
I've also know that there is another mechanism at Solr:
That won't boost order but Lucene's SpanFirstQuery does. You do have to make a
custom query parser plugin for it but that's trivial.
-Original message-
From:Otis Gospodnetic otis.gospodne...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday 26th September 2013 13:24
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject:
As Shawn said, do not expose your Solr server to the internet. Do your internet
users access the server directly or via some frontend application? Almost all
web based applications connect to Solr via some frontend. Usually Solr is
hidden from the internet just as some DBMS is.
Do not expose
Result is the same and performance difference should be negligible, unless
you're uploading megabytes of white space. Consecutive white space should be
collapsed outside of Solr/Lucene anyway because it'll end up in your stored
field. Index size will be slightly bigger but not much due to
Facets do not return the stored constraints, it's usually bad idea to tokenize
or do some have analysis on facet fields. You need to copy your field instead.
-Original message-
From:Tyler Foster tfos...@cloudera.com
Sent: Tuesday 8th October 2013 19:28
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Nice, but now we got three multi-word synonym parsers? Didn't the LUCENE-4499
or SOLR-4381 patches work? I know the latter has had a reasonable amount of
users and committers on github, but it was never brought back to ASF it seems.
-Original message-
From:Otis Gospodnetic
Hi Eric,
We have also helped some government institution to replave their expensive GSA
with open source software. In our case we use Apache Nutch 1.7 to crawl the
websites and index to Apache Solr. It is very effective, robust and scales
easily with Hadoop if you have to. Nutch may not be the
Hi - Use the domain-urlfilter for host, domain and TLD filtering.
Also, please ask questions on the Nutch list, you're on Solr now :)
-Original message-
From:Reyes, Mark mark.re...@bpiedu.com
Sent: Friday 1st November 2013 17:24
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Exclude
You cannot disable coordination factor at query time at this moment so you need
to change your Similarity in the schema. Easiest to do this is to set the
SchemaSimilarityFactory. It defaults to TFIDF but without queryNorm and coord
or use another similarity implementation.
-Original
Hi - we've seen that issue as well (SOLR-4260) and it happend many times with
older versions. The good thing is that we haven't seen it for a very long time
now so i silently assumed other fixes already solved the problem.
We don't know how to reproduce the problem but in older versions it
This is an ancient problem. The issue here is your mm-parameter, it gets
confused because for separate fields different amount of tokens are
filtered/emitted so it is never going to work just like this. The easiest
option is not to use the stopfilter.
You got a 404 for that URL http://localhost:8983/solr/rockies/. Your Solr core
is not there.
Caused by: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Not Found
Not Found
request:
http://localhost:8983/solr/rockies/select?q=*:*fl=idrows=1wt=javabinversion=2
at
Solr has no query parsers that support payloads. You would have make your own
query parser and also create a custom similarity implementing scorePayload for
it to work.
-Original message-
From:Furkan KAMACI furkankam...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday 24th November 2013 19:07
To:
-Original message-
From:Otis Gospodnetic otis.gospodne...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday 20th November 2013 16:40
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Multiple data/index.MMDD dirs == bug?
Hi,
When full index replication is happening via SnapPuller, a temporary
I don't think you mean client-side proxy. You need a server side layer such as
a normal web application or good proxy. We use Nginx, it is very fast and very
feature rich. Its config scripting is usually enough to restrict access and
limit input parameters. We also use Nginx's embedded Perl and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4260
Join the club Tim! Can you upgrade to trunk or incorporate the latest patches
of related issues? You can fix it by trashing the bad node's data, although
without multiple clusters it may be difficult to decide which node is bad.
We use the latest
I can confirm i've seen this issue as well on trunk, a very recent build.
-Original message-
From:Elodie Sannier elodie.sann...@kelkoo.fr
Sent: Monday 9th December 2013 16:43
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: search5t...@lists.kelkoo.com
Subject: SolrCloud 4.6.0 - leader
Trunk (5.x) requires Java 1.7, 4.x still works with 1.6. Check the
CHANGES.txt, you'll see it near the top.
-Original message-
From:Ryan Cutter ryancut...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday 6th January 2014 16:27
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Branch/Java questions re:
You need to use the invertlinks command to build a database with docs with
inlinks and anchors. Then use the index-anchor plugin when indexing. Then you
will have a multivalued field with anchors pointing to your document. Teague
James teag...@insystechinc.com schreef:I am trying to index a
801 - 900 of 1541 matches
Mail list logo
