Thank you Simon.
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:25 AM, simon wrote:
> You might want to take a look at
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4722
> ( 'highlighter which generates a list of query term positions'). We used it
> a while back and doesn't appear to have been
You might want to take a look at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4722
( 'highlighter which generates a list of query term positions'). We used it
a while back and doesn't appear to have been used in any Solr > 4.10)
-Simon
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:43 AM, John Bickerstaff
Beautiful!
Thank you all - that is exactly what I needed to be sure where I stood on
this before going into a meeting today.
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Kevin Risden
wrote:
> For #2 you might be able to get away with the following:
>
>
For #2 you might be able to get away with the following:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/The+Term+Vector+Component
The Term Vector component can return offsets and positions. Not sure how
useful they would be to you, but at least is a starting point. I'm assuming
this requires
For #3 specifically, I've always found this page useful:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Field+Properties+by+Use+Case
It lists out what properties are necessary on each field based on a use
case.
Kevin Risden
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Erick Erickson
(1) No that I have readily at hand. And to make it
worse, there's the UnifiedHighlighter coming out soon
I don't think there's a good way for (2).
for (3) at least yes. The reason is simple. For analyzed text,
the only thing in the index is what's made it through the
analysis chains. So
All,
One of the questions I've been asked to answer / prove out is around the
question of highlighting query matches in responses.
BTW - One assumption I'm making is that highlighting is basically a
function of storing offsets for terms / tokens at index time. If that's
not right, I'd be