Re: CVS commit: [netbsd-5-0] src/external/mit/xorg/server/drivers/xf86-video-s3

2009-06-09 Thread Soren Jacobsen
On 06/09 15:09, Andreas Wrede wrote: > > On Jun 9, 2009, at 13:26 , Soren Jacobsen wrote: > >> Module Name: src >> Committed By:snj >> Date:Tue Jun 9 17:26:27 UTC 2009 >> >> Modified Files: >> src/external/mit/xorg/server/drivers/xf86-video-s3 [netbsd-5-0]: >>

Re: CVS commit: src/lib/libc/sys

2009-06-09 Thread YAMAMOTO Takashi
hi, > On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 11:21:34AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: >> Log Message: >> don't bother to say that some advises are not implemented. >> ignoring them is a valid implementation. > > It should not be under BUGS, but it should still be documented. > E.g. POSIX_FADV_NOREUSE would be

Re: CVS commit: [netbsd-5-0] src/external/mit/xorg/server/drivers/xf86-video-s3

2009-06-09 Thread Andreas Wrede
On Jun 9, 2009, at 13:26 , Soren Jacobsen wrote: Module Name:src Committed By: snj Date: Tue Jun 9 17:26:27 UTC 2009 Modified Files: src/external/mit/xorg/server/drivers/xf86-video-s3 [netbsd-5-0]: Makefile Log Message: Apply patch (requested by ahoka in t

re: CVS commit: src/share/man/man7

2009-06-09 Thread matthew green
> >Module Name:src >Committed By: cegger >Date: Tue Jun 9 13:05:15 UTC 2009 > >Modified Files: >src/share/man/man7: hier.7 > >Log Message: >X11R6 -> X11R7 >ok wiz@ > > > R6 is still va

Re: CVS commit: src/share/man/man7

2009-06-09 Thread Christoph Egger
> >Module Name: src >Committed By: cegger >Date: Tue Jun 9 13:05:15 UTC 2009 > >Modified Files: > src/share/man/man7: hier.7 > >Log Message: >X11R6 -> X11R7 >ok wiz@ > > > R6 is still valid for many ports. When I back this out,

re: CVS commit: src/share/man/man7

2009-06-09 Thread matthew green
Module Name: src Committed By:cegger Date:Tue Jun 9 13:05:15 UTC 2009 Modified Files: src/share/man/man7: hier.7 Log Message: X11R6 -> X11R7 ok wiz@ R6 is still valid for many ports. .mrg.

Re: CVS commit: src/lib/libc/sys

2009-06-09 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 11:21:34AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: > Log Message: > don't bother to say that some advises are not implemented. > ignoring them is a valid implementation. It should not be under BUGS, but it should still be documented. E.g. POSIX_FADV_NOREUSE would be very helpful for