> Log Message:
> CP0 ECC and CACHE_ERR "not implemented" on RMI XLS, so avoid accessing them
> @@ -508,8 +508,10 @@
>
> if (MIPS_HAS_LLSC) {
> if (CPUISMIPS64) {
> +#if !defined(MIPS64_XLS) /* CP0 reg #17
> "reserved" */
>
hi,
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: apb
> Date: Mon Sep 14 19:29:20 UTC 2009
>
> Modified Files:
> src/lib/libkvm: kvm.c
>
> Log Message:
> Move the code that tries to open _PATH_KSYMS first into a common path,
> so that it is used both for the /dev/mem case and the core dump c
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 01:43:52AM +, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
>
> Log Message:
> Pull a fix for mount function from ffs_vfsops.c rev1.186:
> > Change ffs_mount, in MNT_UPDATE case, to check dev_t's for equality
> > instead of just vnode pointers. Fixes erroneous "does not match mounted
> > devic
On 15/Sep - 00:33, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> > Modified Files:
> > src/sbin/ifconfig: Makefile.inc
> >
> > Log Message:
> > Change from using ${.CURDIR} to ${NETBSDSRCDIR} because this file
> > may be included by different parts of the source tree, in particular
> > deep down in the distrib/ tree
> Modified Files:
> src/sbin/ifconfig: Makefile.inc
>
> Log Message:
> Change from using ${.CURDIR} to ${NETBSDSRCDIR} because this file
> may be included by different parts of the source tree, in particular
> deep down in the distrib/ tree, where ../.. isn't sufficient to "climb"
> up to th
> > The problem is that the linker suddenly changed behaviour and no longer
> > provided the symbols which used to satisfy those unresolved symbols. I have
> > convinced the linker to once again provide those symbols hence fixing the
> > build.
>
> I think you need to do some more testing and (r
[This will be my last email on this subject]
On Monday 14 September 2009 12:29:15 Antti Kantee wrote:
> On Mon Sep 14 2009 at 12:04:18 +0100, Nick Hudson wrote:
> > > rump hasn't relied on linksets since August 2008 (and even then there
> > > was only a few day window of linkset use after introduc
Am 14.09.2009 um 14:24 schrieb Michael Shalayeff:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:44:34PM +0100, Matthias Scheler wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:17:25AM +, Michael Shalayeff wrote:
pfsync never collided w/ anything. it used "unassigned" proto
number.
Does it still do that?
of course. a
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:44:34PM +0100, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:17:25AM +, Michael Shalayeff wrote:
> > pfsync never collided w/ anything. it used "unassigned" proto number.
>
> Does it still do that?
of course. adding extra udp encapsualtion only kills performa
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:17:25AM +, Michael Shalayeff wrote:
> pfsync never collided w/ anything. it used "unassigned" proto number.
Does it still do that?
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://zhadum.org.uk/
On Mon Sep 14 2009 at 12:04:18 +0100, Nick Hudson wrote:
> > rump hasn't relied on linksets since August 2008 (and even then there was
> > only a few day window of linkset use after introducing dynamic linking
> > to rump). The only thing that matters is the entry point, which,
> > incidentally, i
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:53:25AM +0100, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:36:51AM +, DEGROOTE Arnaud wrote:
> > Log Message:
> > Import pfsync support from OpenBSD 4.2
>
> Does it still use its on IP protocol that clashes with one of
> Cisco's weird protocols? Or was it sw
On Monday 14 September 2009 10:20:52 Antti Kantee wrote:
> On Mon Sep 14 2009 at 08:15:36 +0100, Nick Hudson wrote:
[...]
> > > The binutils regression is that between 2.16 and 2.19 __start_sectname
> > > for orphaned sections was changed to use PROVIDE instead of define and
> > > hence those symbo
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:36:51AM +, DEGROOTE Arnaud wrote:
> Log Message:
> Import pfsync support from OpenBSD 4.2
Does it still use its on IP protocol that clashes with one of
Cisco's weird protocols? Or was it switched to UDP in the meantime.
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler
On Mon Sep 14 2009 at 08:15:36 +0100, Nick Hudson wrote:
> > In the future if you run across a problem which you are unable to
> > understand, debug and fix on your own, please ask for assistance.
> > Commits with handwavy and incorrect information make it more difficult
> > to track down and fix t
On Sunday 13 September 2009 23:57:17 Antti Kantee wrote:
> On Fri Sep 11 2009 at 06:48:50 +, Nick Hudson wrote:
> > Module Name:src
> > Committed By: skrll
> > Date: Fri Sep 11 06:48:50 UTC 2009
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > src/usr.sbin/puffs/rump_smbfs: Makefile
16 matches
Mail list logo
