Re: CVS commit: src/sys/dev/ieee1394

2010-05-24 Thread Christos Zoulas
On May 24, 2:23pm, kiyoh...@kk.iij4u.or.jp (KIYOHARA Takashi) wrote: -- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/dev/ieee1394 | Hi! Christos, | | | From: Christos Zoulas chris...@netbsd.org | Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 14:56:59 -0400 | | Module Name:src | Committed By: christos | Date:

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/dev/ieee1394

2010-05-24 Thread Izumi Tsutsui
Why you revert it all? Wasn't it broken? I had been investigating the problem of kmem since last week. Was not There is no reason to leave kernels broken even if you have some idea for proper fixes. You can put them even after you (or other guys) revert the previous changes, can't you? ---

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/dev/ieee1394

2010-05-24 Thread KIYOHARA Takashi
Hi! From: Izumi Tsutsui tsut...@ceres.dti.ne.jp Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 22:08:21 +0900 Why you revert it all? Wasn't it broken? Yes. It knows I was broken, too. However, it worked on my ofppc and it booted my amd64. I had been investigating the problem of kmem since last week. Was not

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/dev/ieee1394

2010-05-24 Thread Izumi Tsutsui
In many cases, there is a case that cannot be fixed in several days. For In any case you should revert your changes first if you know you broke the tree and you can't fix it soon. --- Izumi Tsutsui

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/dev/ieee1394

2010-05-24 Thread Christos Zoulas
On May 24, 10:32pm, kiyoh...@kk.iij4u.or.jp (KIYOHARA Takashi) wrote: -- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/dev/ieee1394 | Hi! | | | From: Izumi Tsutsui tsut...@ceres.dti.ne.jp | Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 22:08:21 +0900 | | Why you revert it all? | | Wasn't it broken? | | Yes. It knows I was

Re: CVS commit: src/sys

2010-05-24 Thread David Young
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 08:29:49PM +, Paul Goyette wrote: Module Name: src Committed By: pgoyette Date: Mon May 24 20:29:49 UTC 2010 Modified Files: src/sys/arch/i386/pci: gcscehci.c src/sys/dev/cardbus: ehci_cardbus.c ohci_cardbus.c uhci_cardbus.c