On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 02:40:45AM +, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
Hello,
Juergen Hannken-Illjes hann...@netbsd.org wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: hannken
Date: Tue Nov 23 09:30:43 UTC 2010
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev: md.c
Log
David Holland dholland-sourcechan...@netbsd.org writes:
Adding weird special case remote access hacks to dd (of all random
tools) is also poor design. Why not for the next round add support for
dd ifurl=http://www.netbsd.org/index.html of=mycopy
or
dd ifurl=http://www.netbsd.org/
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:15:59PM +0100, Juergen Hannken-Illjes wrote:
+kmutex_t sc_lock; /* Protect self. */
+kcondvar_t sc_cv; /* Signal work. */
I think Signal work is missleading. :)
No. It DOES signal work to the umem server.
But it's not for
In article 20101124225754.6201e17...@cvs.netbsd.org,
David A. Holland source-changes-d@NetBSD.org wrote:
- (void)snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), %dd, prec 9 ? 9 : prec);
+ (void)snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), %dld, prec 9 ? 9 : prec);
perhaps %dlld?
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:11:36PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
- (void)snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), %dd, prec 9 ? 9 : prec);
+ (void)snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), %dld, prec 9 ? 9 : prec);
perhaps %dlld?
Nope, that's the nsecs, which are long.
I'm sort of inclined to
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, NetBSD source-changes Digest wrote:
NetBSD source-changes Digest Wednesday, November 24 2010 Volume 02 : Number 1781
...
Hmmm, did something change recently?
I used to be subscribed only to source-changes but for the last couple
of days I've also been getting the
hi,
Hello,
Sorry for late reply.
y...@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
how about the attached patch?
Consider offset = (INT64_MAX - PAGE_SIZE) and len = PAGE_SIZE. That
would still panic..
heh, right.
then, how about:
if (round_page(offset)
On Nov 24, 11:49pm, dholland-sourcechan...@netbsd.org (David Holland) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/usr.bin/stat
| On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:11:36PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
| - (void)snprintf(tmp, sizeof(tmp), %dd, prec 9 ? 9 : prec);
| + (void)snprintf(tmp,
hi,
- what's VM_PHYSSEG_OP_PG?
- why *offp calculation is done in _p functions, rather than the caller?
YAMAMOTO Takashi
Module Name: src
Committed By: uebayasi
Date: Sun Nov 14 15:06:34 UTC 2010
Modified Files:
src/sys/uvm: uvm_page.c uvm_page.h uvm_pglist.c
Log
Hi, thanks for review.
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 01:58:04AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
hi,
- what's VM_PHYSSEG_OP_PG?
It's to lookup vm_physseg by struct vm_page *, relying on that
struct vm_page *[] is allocated linearly. It'll be used to remove
vm_page::phys_addr as we talked some time
hi,
Hi, thanks for review.
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 01:58:04AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
hi,
- what's VM_PHYSSEG_OP_PG?
It's to lookup vm_physseg by struct vm_page *, relying on that
struct vm_page *[] is allocated linearly. It'll be used to remove
vm_page::phys_addr as we
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 04:18:25AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
hi,
Hi, thanks for review.
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 01:58:04AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
hi,
- what's VM_PHYSSEG_OP_PG?
It's to lookup vm_physseg by struct vm_page *, relying on that
struct vm_page *[] is
hi,
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 04:18:25AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
hi,
Hi, thanks for review.
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 01:58:04AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
hi,
- what's VM_PHYSSEG_OP_PG?
It's to lookup vm_physseg by struct vm_page *, relying on that
struct vm_page
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:44:21AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
hi,
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 04:18:25AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
hi,
Hi, thanks for review.
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 01:58:04AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
hi,
- what's VM_PHYSSEG_OP_PG?
On Nov 24, 2010, at 10:47 PM, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:44:21AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
hi,
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 04:18:25AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
hi,
Hi, thanks for review.
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 01:58:04AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
15 matches
Mail list logo
