On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:43:24AM +, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: jruoho
Date: Wed Feb 23 11:43:23 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/amd64/conf: GENERIC XEN3_DOM0
src/sys/arch/i386/conf: ALL GENERIC
src/sys/arch/x86/conf:
On Wed Feb 23 2011 at 01:31:51 +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
On Mon Feb 21 2011 at 23:19:47 +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By:pooka
Date:Mon Feb 7 19:34:39 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/lib/librumphijack: hijack.c
Log
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:17:43 +0900, Masao Uebayashi
uebay...@tombi.co.jp wrote:
IMHO, for x86, the kernel cannot assume that the bootloader loaded
certain modules, nor can the bootloader expect that kernel XYZ is in
a
specific configuration. They should be agnostic from one another.
I think
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 01:33:05AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
hi,
On Feb 22, 2011, at 1:31 PM, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: yamt
Date: Tue Feb 22 21:31:16 UTC 2011
Added Files:
src/common/lib/libc/gen: radixtree.c
hi,
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 01:33:05AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
hi,
On Feb 22, 2011, at 1:31 PM, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: yamt
Date: Tue Feb 22 21:31:16 UTC 2011
Added Files:
src/common/lib/libc/gen: radixtree.c
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:12:50AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
I wrote:
Aren't both ptree and radixtree missing documentation?
right. both of them are work-in-progress piece of code. well, at least
radixtree is.
are you suggesting something?
Yes: commit new libraries with
hi,
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:12:50AM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
I wrote:
Aren't both ptree and radixtree missing documentation?
right. both of them are work-in-progress piece of code. well, at least
radixtree is.
are you suggesting something?
Yes: commit new libraries with
