matthew green wrote:
since satmgr(4) is sandpoint specific, it very much does not
belong in the 144-159 range.
why does it need to be changed?
Because I fear that the next developer who adds a new device to
majors.powerpc will use 100, without realizing it is in use by sandpoint.
this
Frank Wille said;
either way, 144 is wrong.
Ok. So you would suggest to allocate 100 for all powerpc ports?
arch/powerpc/conf/major.powerpc contains gtmpsc for Marvell
Discovery PPC system controller which is particular for a very
specific platform. Then, it'd be forgiving to cope with
Jukka Ruohonen jru...@netbsd.org wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: jruoho
Date: Fri Feb 25 09:16:00 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/arch/x86/acpi: acpi_cpu_md.c
src/sys/dev/acpi: acpi_cpu.h acpi_cpu_pstate.c
Log Message:
Add preliminary support for the
Jukka Ruohonen jruoho...@iki.fi wrote:
Are there any plans for kernel equivalent to cpuset(3)?
Yes, there is kcpuset(9), see kcpuset_create() and friends. I plan to
modify it so it could be used early in MD code (when memory allocation
is not yet available) and thus unify random MD cpuset
Hello,
y...@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
Log Message:
an implementation of radix tree. the idea from linux.
How is that different from ptree?
while i'm not familiar with ptree...
Patricia/Radix tree added by Matt (see src/common/lib/libc/gen/ptree.c
and
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:48:43PM +, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
Why interrupts are disabled here? Calling xc_wait() with interrupts
disabled is, at minimum, very expensive, and I would say it is wrong.
Note that xc_wait(9) does not necessary spin - it can block.
Because interrupts
Jukka Ruohonen jruoho...@iki.fi wrote:
Why interrupts are disabled here? Calling xc_wait() with interrupts
disabled is, at minimum, very expensive, and I would say it is wrong.
Note that xc_wait(9) does not necessary spin - it can block.
Because interrupts must be disabled when APERF and
Matt Thomas wrote:
As the overall powerpc port maintainer, I'd rather see all new
majors be allocated from major.powerpc. This is that eventually
all powerpc ports can use the same major number and that will
eliminate one reason why we can't have a shared userland.
Ok, agreed. We make it
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:08:07PM +, Jonathan A. Kollasch wrote:
autogen requires ed(1), which is not provided by our toolchain.
(In other words, this causes a odd build failure on some Linux build
hosts.)
I've not looked, but it is probably not too hard to change the script
to use a
