On 29.08.2011 06:30, Christoph Egger wrote:
> On 29.08.11 06:26, Christoph Egger wrote:
>> On 29.08.11 00:09, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
>>> Module Name:src
>>> Committed By: jym
>>> Date: Sun Aug 28 22:09:37 UTC 2011
>>>
>>> Modified Files:
>>> src/share/man/man4: ddb.
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 09:28:56AM +, Marc Balmer wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: mbalmer
> Date: Sat Aug 27 09:28:56 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/arch/i386/conf: GENERIC
>
> Log Message:
> Enable some gpio devices.
Is onewire(4) really something to be enab
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 09:01:47AM +0200, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
> What kind of console is attaching for you in dom0? I can't see how
> '+' would get wired in by default. At least when either started from
> bare metal, or QEMU.
'+' is used for serial console (or, to be more precise, xenco
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 08:47:51AM +0200, J. Hannken-Illjes wrote:
>
> On Aug 29, 2011, at 2:39 AM, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
>
> > Module Name:src
> > Committed By: rmind
> > Date: Mon Aug 29 00:39:16 UTC 2011
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > src/sys/kern: sys_se
Cc:ing tech-kern, to get wider feedback.
Thread started here:
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes-d/2011/08/21/msg003897.html
> "JM" == Jean-Yves Migeon writes:
JM> On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:47:40 +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
>>> This is slightly more complicated than it appears
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:07:05PM +0200, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
> JM> On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:47:40 +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> >>> This is slightly more complicated than it appears. Some of the
> >>> "ops" in a per-cpu queue may have ordering dependencies with
> >>> other cpu qu
Can you put the driver xrefs back in 'SEE ALSO'? I find it useful.
-Original Message-
From: Jukka Ruohonen
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 6:41 AM Newsgroups:
gmane.os.netbsd.devel.cvs.full
To: source-changes-full-qavaossjccednm+yrof...@public.gmane.org
Subject: CVS commit: src/share/man
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 07:19:04AM -0400, Jared McNeill wrote:
> Can you put the driver xrefs back in 'SEE ALSO'? I find it useful.
I prefer personally a clear list instead (particularly if we have more than
10 of these drivers some day). But sure.
- Jukka.
> -Original Message-
> From:
> "Cherry" == Cherry G Mathew writes:
[...]
Cherry> Xen's TLB_FLUSH operation is synchronous, and doesn't
I mean, Xen's TLB_FLUSH_MULTI operations. my current implementation of
tlb shootdown is therefore synchronous wrt TLB flushes on all cpus.
Cheers,
--
Cherry
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:46:06 +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 09:01:47AM +0200, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
What kind of console is attaching for you in dom0? I can't see how
'+' would get wired in by default. At least when either started
from
bare metal, or QEMU.
'+'
Am 29.08.11 11:38, schrieb Jukka Ruohonen:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 09:28:56AM +, Marc Balmer wrote:
>> Module Name: src
>> Committed By:mbalmer
>> Date:Sat Aug 27 09:28:56 UTC 2011
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> src/sys/arch/i386/conf: GENERIC
>>
>> Log Message:
>> Enab
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 02:48:52PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
> Am 29.08.11 11:38, schrieb Jukka Ruohonen:
> > On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 09:28:56AM +, Marc Balmer wrote:
> >> Module Name: src
> >> Committed By: mbalmer
> >> Date: Sat Aug 27 09:28:56 UTC 2011
> >>
> >> Modif
Am 29.08.11 14:53, schrieb Jukka Ruohonen:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 02:48:52PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
>> Am 29.08.11 11:38, schrieb Jukka Ruohonen:
>>> On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 09:28:56AM +, Marc Balmer wrote:
Module Name: src
Committed By: mbalmer
Date:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 02:58:32PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
> Am 29.08.11 14:53, schrieb Jukka Ruohonen:
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 02:48:52PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
> >> Am 29.08.11 11:38, schrieb Jukka Ruohonen:
> >>> On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 09:28:56AM +, Marc Balmer wrote:
> Module
Hi Manuel,
> "Manuel" == Manuel Bouyer writes:
[...]
>>
>> Xen's TLB_FLUSH operation is synchronous, and doesn't require an
>> IPI (within the domain), which makes the queue ordering even more
>> important (to make sure that stale ptes are not reloaded before
>> the pe
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:45:27PM +0100, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
> Hmm, I'll have to cross-check that one this afternoon. IIRC, I am
> also using the the default "break" command when I am running the
> dom0 inside QEMU, and '+' is only used when I want to break in
> the domU (through xencons(4
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 03:03:37PM +0200, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
> Hi Manuel,
>
> > "Manuel" == Manuel Bouyer writes:
>
>
> [...]
>
> >>
> >> Xen's TLB_FLUSH operation is synchronous, and doesn't require an
> >> IPI (within the domain), which makes the queue ordering even mor
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:25:03 +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:45:27PM +0100, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
Hmm, I'll have to cross-check that one this afternoon. IIRC, I am
also using the the default "break" command when I am running the
dom0 inside QEMU, and '+' is only used
On 29.08.2011 15:03, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
> I'm a bit confused now - are we assuming that the pmap lock protects the
> (pte update op queue-push(es) + pmap_pte_flush()) as a single atomic
> operation (ie; no invlpg/tlbflush or out-of-band-read can occur between
> the update(s) and the pmap_pte_f
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 03:17:16PM +0100, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
> Both; usually I am using the VGA-emulated display, but sometimes
> (like I did lately) I switch to console, so I can keep a reasonable
> amount of history of the dom0 output in my terminal.
The the dom0 kernel is using xencons, an
On 29.08.2011 22:27, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 03:17:16PM +0100, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
>> Both; usually I am using the VGA-emulated display, but sometimes
>> (like I did lately) I switch to console, so I can keep a reasonable
>> amount of history of the dom0 output in my term
21 matches
Mail list logo
