On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:49:22 +0530, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
Please keep ci_pae_l3_pdir to a uint32_t and back out its paddr_t
type.
Unless you can convince me that your code will do the right
thing(tm), the
PDP for PAE should to be allocated below the 4GiB physical boundary;
unless
mistaken, t
On 8 November 2011 05:50, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
> On 06.11.2011 16:18, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
>> Module Name: src
>> Committed By: cherry
>> Date: Sun Nov 6 15:18:19 UTC 2011
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> src/sys/arch/amd64/include: pmap.h
>> src/sys/arch/i386/include: pmap.h
>
On 8 November 2011 15:20, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:49:22 +0530, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
>>>
>>> Please keep ci_pae_l3_pdir to a uint32_t and back out its paddr_t type.
>>>
>>> Unless you can convince me that your code will do the right thing(tm),
>>> the
>>> PDP for PAE shou
On 8 November 2011 19:11, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
> On 8 November 2011 05:50, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
>> On 06.11.2011 16:18, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
>>> Module Name: src
>>> Committed By: cherry
>>> Date: Sun Nov 6 15:18:19 UTC 2011
>>>
>>> Modified Files:
>>> src/sys/arch/amd64/
In article <2007202432.ga7...@britannica.bec.de>,
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 04:06:30PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> Well, I tried to print the failing pattern in t_expand, and it silently
>> got truncated. dprintf(3) has been part of TOG since 2006:
>> (http://pub
In article <4eb84f56.6060...@netbsd.org>,
Marc Balmer wrote:
>Am 07.11.11 21:01, schrieb Joerg Sonnenberger:
>> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 02:27:03PM +0200, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 10:20:38AM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
The majority of interesting programs already
On 08.11.2011 14:53, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
On 8 November 2011 15:20, Jean-Yves Migeon
wrote:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:49:22 +0530, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
Please keep ci_pae_l3_pdir to a uint32_t and back out its
paddr_t type.
Unless you can convince me that your code will do the right
thing(
On 11/8/11 3:25 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <2007202432.ga7...@britannica.bec.de>,
> Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 04:06:30PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>>> Well, I tried to print the failing pattern in t_expand, and it silently
>>> got truncated. dprintf
On Nov 8, 6:48pm, j...@netbsd.org (Julio Merino) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/external/bsd/atf/dist/atf-c
| On 11/8/11 3:25 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
| > In article <2007202432.ga7...@britannica.bec.de>,
| > Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
| >> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 04:06:30PM +,
Hi,
On 9 November 2011 02:02, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
> On 08.11.2011 14:53, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
>>
>> On 8 November 2011 15:20, Jean-Yves Migeon
>
> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:49:22 +0530, Cherry G. Mathew wrote:
>
> Please keep ci_pae_l3_pdir to a uint32_t and back out its
On 11/8/11 7:32 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Yes, I did. I actually wrote the test backwards 2ice because INV has inverted
> logic than regular assert for some reason.
It doesn't. INV(x) is the same as assert(x) -- or it is supposed to be
-- but if it wasn't, things would have broken much earlier
11 matches
Mail list logo
