do we have to fix src/dist/nvi/regex too?
it is same spencer regex code as src/lib/libc/regex (but modified for
wide character).
ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/misc/tnozaki/patch-dist_nvi_regex
very truly yours
--
Takehiko NOZAKI
2011/10/10 Christos Zoulas :
> Module Name: src
> Committed
On 11/14/11 3:23 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: christos
Date: Mon Nov 14 20:23:29 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/tests/util/sh: Makefile
Added Files:
src/tests/util/sh: t_evaltested.sh
Log Message:
Add a test for PR/45613 (eval failing in
On 11/16/11 12:46 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: christos
Date: Wed Nov 16 17:46:16 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/external/bsd/atf/dist/atf-c++/detail: text.cpp text.hpp
src/external/bsd/atf/dist/atf-run: requirements.cpp test-program.cpp
Since this test is succeeding on amd64 with only 128MB allocated in
qemu, do we really need to set the minimum to 500?
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: christos
Date: Wed Nov 16 17:47:19 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/tests/lib/l
On Nov 16, 10:23am, p...@whooppee.com (Paul Goyette) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/tests/lib/libc/regex
| Since this test is succeeding on amd64 with only 128MB allocated in
| qemu, do we really need to set the minimum to 500?
Ok, I will reduce it.
christos
In article <4ec3f8f7.8020...@netbsd.org>,
Julio Merino wrote:
>On 11/16/11 12:46 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> Module Name: src
>> Committed By:christos
>> Date:Wed Nov 16 17:46:16 UTC 2011
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> src/external/bsd/atf/dist/atf-c++/detail: text.cpp te
On 11/16/11 1:51 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
In article<4ec3f8f7.8020...@netbsd.org>,
Julio Merino wrote:
On 11/16/11 12:46 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: christos
Date: Wed Nov 16 17:46:16 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/external/bsd/atf/dist/atf
In article <4ec40d98.4070...@netbsd.org>,
Julio Merino wrote:
>
>I know there is no portable way, but at least we can default to "do
>nothing" if this is not supported. It's better than "not building" :-P
Oh, I can arrange that. #ifdef __NetBSD__ :-)
But in my view this is worse...
>Yes, they
On 11/16/11 3:11 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
In article<4ec40d98.4070...@netbsd.org>,
Julio Merino wrote:
I know there is no portable way, but at least we can default to "do
nothing" if this is not supported. It's better than "not building" :-P
Oh, I can arrange that. #ifdef __NetBSD__ :-)
B
