Re: CVS commit: src/doc

2012-03-01 Thread Alan Barrett
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012, Jukka Ruohonen wrote: > > tzcode2012b and tzdata2012b ahve been released. > > We have updated to tzdata2012b. > > What was the resolution with the patent issues and whatnot? The lawsuit was withdrawn after it became obvious that the plaintiffs had no valid case. The EFF got

Re: CVS commit: src/doc

2012-03-01 Thread Jukka Ruohonen
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 07:06:31AM +, Alan Barrett wrote: > Module Name: src > Committed By: apb > Date: Fri Mar 2 07:06:31 UTC 2012 > > Modified Files: > src/doc: 3RDPARTY > > Log Message: > tzcode2012b and tzdata2012b ahve been released. > We have updated to tzdata2012b. Wh

Re: CVS commit: src/lib/libc

2012-03-01 Thread David Laight
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 05:07:32PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > My strong dislike of *_s from C11 is not relevant. Those functions are > not part of the core standard, but an (optional) annex. gets() is pretty bad for anything that is system or suid. For a normal user app it doesn't matte

Re: CVS commit: src/share/zoneinfo

2012-03-01 Thread Alan Barrett
On Thu, 01 Mar 2012, Alan Barrett wrote: Update of /cvsroot/src/share/zoneinfo Log Message: Import tzdata2012a from ftp://munnari.oz.au/pub/tzdata2012a.tar.gz. Major changes since tzdata2011i: [...] That should be "Major changes since tzdata2011n". I have updated the log messages in the reposi

Re: CVS commit: src/lib/libc

2012-03-01 Thread Warner Losh
On Mar 1, 2012, at 10:58 AM, Izumi Tsutsui wrote: >>> Again, how can you support/control/update third party products >>> not to use deprecated functions? Our libc is designed for >>> NetBSD? >> >> You can't make them not use deprecated functions, but I think you >> can tell them to link with

Re: CVS commit: src/lib/libc

2012-03-01 Thread Izumi Tsutsui
> > Again, how can you support/control/update third party products > > not to use deprecated functions? Our libc is designed for > > NetBSD? > > You can't make them not use deprecated functions, but I think you > can tell them to link with libdeprecated, or to add -DI_WANT_GETS > to CFLAGS.

Re: CVS commit: src/lib/libc

2012-03-01 Thread Alan Barrett
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012, Izumi Tsutsui wrote: Again, how can you support/control/update third party products not to use deprecated functions? Our libc is designed for NetBSD? You can't make them not use deprecated functions, but I think you can tell them to link with libdeprecated, or to add -DI

Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/utils/sysinst

2012-03-01 Thread Izumi Tsutsui
mbalmer@ wrote: > >> Log Message: > >> Put back spaces at EOL where needed (in a message file, a space at EOL > >> means a line break, a line break means a space...) > >> This should fix PR 46042. > > > > Did you check all changes? > > I mechanically reverted all whitespace changes so we have th

Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/utils/sysinst

2012-03-01 Thread Marc Balmer
Am 01.03.12 17:31, schrieb Izumi Tsutsui: >> Module Name: src >> Committed By:mbalmer >> Date:Thu Mar 1 16:22:16 UTC 2012 >> >> Modified Files: >> src/distrib/utils/sysinst: msg.mbr.de msg.mbr.en msg.mbr.es msg.mbr.fr >> msg.mbr.pl msg.mi.de msg.mi.en msg.mi.e

Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/utils/sysinst

2012-03-01 Thread Izumi Tsutsui
> Module Name: src > Committed By: mbalmer > Date: Thu Mar 1 16:22:16 UTC 2012 > > Modified Files: > src/distrib/utils/sysinst: msg.mbr.de msg.mbr.en msg.mbr.es msg.mbr.fr > msg.mbr.pl msg.mi.de msg.mi.en msg.mi.es msg.mi.fr msg.mi.pl > src/distrib/utils/sysinst/arc

Re: CVS commit: src/lib/libc

2012-03-01 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 10:37:39AM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote: > > Code that is using gets(3) is almost always broken. It doesn't just > > No argument there, but that's not the question. The questions are > > should NetBSD provide a compliant C99 environment? (obviously yes) > > is movin

Re: CVS commit: src/lib/libc

2012-03-01 Thread Izumi Tsutsui
joerg@ wrote: > On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 12:10:26AM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote: > > joerg@ wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 07:35:02PM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote: > > > > yamt@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Module Name:src > > > > > > Committed By: dholland > > > > > > Date:

Re: CVS commit: src/lib/libc

2012-03-01 Thread Greg Troxel
Code that is using gets(3) is almost always broken. It doesn't just No argument there, but that's not the question. The questions are should NetBSD provide a compliant C99 environment? (obviously yes) is moving gets(3) to libcompat consistent with the above (it seems not, since your

Re: CVS commit: src/lib/libc

2012-03-01 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 12:10:26AM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote: > joerg@ wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 07:35:02PM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote: > > > yamt@ wrote: > > > > > > > > Module Name: src > > > > > Committed By: dholland > > > > > Date: Fri Feb 24 16:06:39 UTC 2012 > > > > >

Re: CVS commit: src/lib/libc

2012-03-01 Thread Izumi Tsutsui
joerg@ wrote: > On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 07:35:02PM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote: > > yamt@ wrote: > > > > > > Module Name:src > > > > Committed By: dholland > > > > Date: Fri Feb 24 16:06:39 UTC 2012 > > > > > > > > Modified Files: > > > > src/lib/libc: shlib_version > > >

Re: CVS commit: src/lib/libc

2012-03-01 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 07:35:02PM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote: > yamt@ wrote: > > > > Module Name: src > > > Committed By: dholland > > > Date: Fri Feb 24 16:06:39 UTC 2012 > > > > > > Modified Files: > > > src/lib/libc: shlib_version > > > > > > Log Message: > > > Note th

Re: CVS commit: src/lib/libc

2012-03-01 Thread Izumi Tsutsui
yamt@ wrote: > > Module Name:src > > Committed By: dholland > > Date: Fri Feb 24 16:06:39 UTC 2012 > > > > Modified Files: > > src/lib/libc: shlib_version > > > > Log Message: > > Note that gets() is finally dead in C11 and can be removed if we ever > > bump libc.

Re: CVS commit: src/lib/libc

2012-03-01 Thread YAMAMOTO Takashi
hi, > Module Name: src > Committed By: dholland > Date: Fri Feb 24 16:06:39 UTC 2012 > > Modified Files: > src/lib/libc: shlib_version > > Log Message: > Note that gets() is finally dead in C11 and can be removed if we ever > bump libc. it doesn't sound good or realistic to me.