Re: CVS commit: src/sys

2012-05-31 Thread David Laight
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 05:11:09PM -0700, John Nemeth wrote: On Oct 11, 4:10pm, David Laight wrote: } } Module Name:src } Committed By: dsl } Date: Mon May 21 21:34:16 UTC 2012 } } Modified Files: } src/sys/arch/i386/stand/lib: exec.c }

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/lib/libexecinfo

2012-05-31 Thread Martin Husemann
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 03:11:58PM +, Jukka Ruohonen wrote: Log Message: Use atf_arch instead of atf_machine; see atf-config(1). What is the difference? atf-config(1) is mumbling about unnamed bugs and upstream fixes, but does not explain what differs and which should be prefered. Martin

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/lib/libexecinfo

2012-05-31 Thread Jukka Ruohonen
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:29:55PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote: On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 03:11:58PM +, Jukka Ruohonen wrote: Log Message: Use atf_arch instead of atf_machine; see atf-config(1). What is the difference? I think there is no such thing as atf_machine. - Jukka.

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/lib/libexecinfo

2012-05-31 Thread Martin Husemann
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 01:58:50PM +0300, Jukka Ruohonen wrote: I think there is no such thing as atf_machine. Well, it worked for me ;-) atf_machine The machine type name detected by ATF. This should not be tunable but is provided for symmetry with

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/lib/libexecinfo

2012-05-31 Thread Jukka Ruohonen
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 01:00:52PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote: Well, it worked for me ;-) atf_machine The machine type name detected by ATF. This should not be tunable but is provided for symmetry with atf_arch. My bad.

Re: CVS commit: src/sys

2012-05-31 Thread David Laight
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:06:28AM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote: On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 07:38:53AM +0100, David Laight wrote: IIRC you can explicitly request (from boot.cfg) that any module be loaded. There is no need for boot itself to always try to load such a module. Yes there is,

Re: CVS commit: src/sys

2012-05-31 Thread Martin Husemann
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 06:30:38PM +0100, David Laight wrote: But you don't want /boot to try to load the module if the ffs code is present in the kernel. Since /boot has no way of knowing what is in the loaded kernel it is inappropriate for it to try to load the module file and for the kernel

Re: CVS commit: src/sys

2012-05-31 Thread David Laight
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 08:32:42PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote: On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 06:30:38PM +0100, David Laight wrote: But you don't want /boot to try to load the module if the ffs code is present in the kernel. Since /boot has no way of knowing what is in the loaded kernel it is