On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 11:53:09AM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:46:50AM +, Justin Cormack wrote:
> > I believe gcc is correct here, you are only allowed to alias via a
> > char pointer or the original type. Because you put a void pointer in
> > instead gcc is right
On Jan 18, 11:33am, mar...@duskware.de (Martin Husemann) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/external/bsd/file
| On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:32:29PM +, David Laight wrote:
| > If the problem actually caused by gcc failing to pair all the conditionals?
| > Compiling with 'clazz' a compile-tim
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:46:50AM +, Justin Cormack wrote:
> I believe gcc is correct here, you are only allowed to alias via a
> char pointer or the original type. Because you put a void pointer in
> instead gcc is right to complain.
Right, but actually the complaint does not go away if we m
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:32:29PM +, David Laight wrote:
>> If the problem actually caused by gcc failing to pair all the conditionals?
>> Compiling with 'clazz' a compile-time constant might show things.
>
> I don't think so, and I'l
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:32:29PM +, David Laight wrote:
> If the problem actually caused by gcc failing to pair all the conditionals?
> Compiling with 'clazz' a compile-time constant might show things.
I don't think so, and I'll leave a final fix to Christos as maintainer.
> Or, if memcpy()
