Le 07/08/2015 11:38, Christos Zoulas a écrit :
In article 21928.1438883...@splode.eterna.com.au,
matthew green m...@eterna.com.au wrote:
ya - this might actually break some linux binary packages, where
there is a well-defined interface to executing a library.
i think this part should be
Maxime Villard writes:
Le 07/08/2015 11:38, Christos Zoulas a écrit :
In article 21928.1438883...@splode.eterna.com.au,
matthew green m...@eterna.com.au wrote:
ya - this might actually break some linux binary packages, where
there is a well-defined interface to executing a library.
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 03:51:38PM -0700, Matt Thomas wrote:
It's also used for PIE which are usually DYN instead of EXEC.
And we actually have tests for that!
Martin
In article 21928.1438883...@splode.eterna.com.au,
matthew green m...@eterna.com.au wrote:
ya - this might actually break some linux binary packages, where
there is a well-defined interface to executing a library.
i think this part should be reverted.
Indeed:
[5:16am] 1003#/lib/libc.so.6
GNU
On Aug 7, 2015, at 4:05 PM, matthew green m...@eterna.com.au wrote:
linux ld.so has an entry point, for instance. IIRC, it's related
to how their ldd(1) works.
As does our ld.elf_so.1
