On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
> wrote:
>> Ryota Ozaki writes:
>>
>>> One possible fix has been committed.
>>>
>>> Can you update the source code and try a
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Taylor R Campbell
wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 10:31:25 +0900
>> From: Ryota Ozaki
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Taylor R Campbell
>>
> Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 10:31:25 +0900
> From: Ryota Ozaki
>
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Taylor R Campbell
> wrote:
> > Can you add this to the collection?
> >
> > #ifdef NET_MPSAFE
> > #define
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Taylor R Campbell
wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 10:24:26 +0900
>> From: Ryota Ozaki
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 12:50 AM, Taylor R Campbell
>>
> Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 10:24:26 +0900
> From: Ryota Ozaki
>
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 12:50 AM, Taylor R Campbell
> wrote:
> > Can you just pass the interlock -- softnet_lock or NULL, depending on
> > NET_MPSAFE -- as an
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 12:50 AM, Taylor R Campbell
wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2017 18:42:14 +0900
>> From: Ryota Ozaki
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Paul Goyette wrote:
>> > I'd really like to see
> Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2017 18:42:14 +0900
> From: Ryota Ozaki
>
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Paul Goyette wrote:
> > I'd really like to see other peoples' opinions on this matter before
> > making a final decision. (And I'm rather surprised that
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Paul Goyette wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Paul Goyette wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
>>>
> Well, since the lock _might_ be released (and
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Paul Goyette wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
Well, since the lock _might_ be released (and subsequently reacquired)
by callout_halt(), it might be easiest to modify all the callers to
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Paul Goyette wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
>
>>> Well, since the lock _might_ be released (and subsequently reacquired)
>>> by callout_halt(), it might be easiest to modify all the callers to
>>> just unlock it before calling
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
wrote:
> Ryota Ozaki writes:
>
>> One possible fix has been committed.
>>
>> Can you update the source code and try a new kernel?
>
> Will do.
Thanks.
>
> Meanwhile, before I got around to building
11 matches
Mail list logo