> On Dec 23, 2019, at 7:53 PM, Taylor R Campbell
> wrote:
>
>> Module Name:src
>> Committed By: thorpej
>> Date: Sun Dec 22 15:09:39 UTC 2019
>>
>> Add intr_mask() and corresponding intr_unmask() calls that allow specific
>> interrupt lines / sources to be masked as needed
> Module Name:src
> Committed By: thorpej
> Date: Sun Dec 22 15:09:39 UTC 2019
>
> Add intr_mask() and corresponding intr_unmask() calls that allow specific
> interrupt lines / sources to be masked as needed (rather than making a
> set of sources by IPL as with spl*()).
>
> +
> On Dec 23, 2019, at 7:22 PM, Taylor R Campbell
> wrote:
>
> So I guess we won't be switching pg->phys_addr from paddr to pfn?
If that's the case, we should rename the field.
-- thorpej
Date:Mon, 23 Dec 2019 23:45:34 +0100
From:Steffen Nurpmeso
Message-ID: <20191223224534.8ufgy%stef...@sdaoden.eu>
| |Troff reads .ie and checks the condition. The condition is true and
| |so the rest of the line is executed. Then troff reads .el that
|
> Module Name:src
> Committed By: ad
> Date: Sat Dec 21 14:41:44 UTC 2019
>
> - Add inlines to set/get locator values in the unused lower bits of
> pg->phys_addr. Begin by using it to cache the freelist index, because
> computing it is expensive and that shows up during
Valery Ushakov wrote in <20191223222133.gj24...@pony.stderr.spb.ru>:
|On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 22:13:23 +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|> Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote in <20191223201734.0e415f...@cvs.netbsd.org>:
|>
|>|Modified Files:
|>| src/share/tmac: doc2html
|>|
|>|Log Message:
|>|Fix
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 22:13:23 +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote in <20191223201734.0e415f...@cvs.netbsd.org>:
>
> |Modified Files:
> | src/share/tmac: doc2html
> |
> |Log Message:
> |Fix if/else syntax in previous.
>
> What was wrong with that?
>
> . ie
On Dec 23, 11:33am, Greg Troxel wrote:
} Martin Husemann writes:
} > On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 09:02:50AM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
} >> Well, we are coming up on a year since netbsd-9 was branched, or at
} >> least will arrive there before this discussion resolves. So cutting
} >> -10 before we
Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote in <20191223201734.0e415f...@cvs.netbsd.org>:
|Module Name: src
|Committed By: uwe
|Date: Mon Dec 23 20:17:33 UTC 2019
|
|Modified Files:
| src/share/tmac: doc2html
|
|Log Message:
|Fix if/else syntax in previous.
What was wrong with that?
. ie
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 06:54:47PM -, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Here is a patch that:
>
> 1. removes all the special handling of variables (-d -p -P -s -S) that
>were dealing with DBG (-d) LDSTATIC/NOPIE (-p), and the rest with
>disabling/enabling sanitizers.
> 2. uses emalloc/estrdup
Martin Husemann writes:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 09:02:50AM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> Well, we are coming up on a year since netbsd-9 was branched, or at
>> least will arrive there before this discussion resolves. So cutting
>> -10 before we hit 100 works for me :-)
>
> Nitpicking (and I
On 23.12.2019 16:57, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 09:02:50AM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> Well, we are coming up on a year since netbsd-9 was branched, or at
>> least will arrive there before this discussion resolves. So cutting
>> -10 before we hit 100 works for me :-)
>
>
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 09:02:50AM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
> Well, we are coming up on a year since netbsd-9 was branched, or at
> least will arrive there before this discussion resolves. So cutting
> -10 before we hit 100 works for me :-)
Nitpicking (and I don't know for the discussion
Kamil Rytarowski writes:
> On 23.12.2019 01:54, Roy Marples wrote:
>> On 22/12/2019 22:24, Andrew Doran wrote:
>>> NetBSD 9.99.29 - struct mount changed.
>>
>> Just curious - does our build software cope with 3 digit for the last
>> number?
>>
>> Roy
>
> At least from the __NetBSD_Version__
Le 23/12/2019 à 04:18, Taylor R Campbell a écrit :
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2019 10:24:01 +0100
From: Maxime Villard
You, Martin Christos and Taylor, are trying to change subject, find
excuses, and are sending me irrelevant responses vaguely insinuating that
I should revert my change only without
15 matches
Mail list logo
