> Date:Sat, 28 Mar 2020 11:46:29 +1100
> From:matthew green
> Message-ID: <15233.1585356...@splode.eterna.com.au>
>
> | can we just leave this as-is and let netbsd GCC people care?
>
> Only if the GCC people do care, and understand the issue, and
> implement what w
Date:Sat, 28 Mar 2020 11:46:29 +1100
From:matthew green
Message-ID: <15233.1585356...@splode.eterna.com.au>
| can we just leave this as-is and let netbsd GCC people care?
Only if the GCC people do care, and understand the issue, and
implement what we want
Base
i don't like this "don't care about netbsd-8" feeling i'm hearing
when netbsd-9 is so freshly released. we only *just* dropped
caring about netbsd-7.
please care about netbsd-8 for now.
.mrg.
can we just leave this as-is and let netbsd GCC people care?
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 02:11:36PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> I don't see why we don't care about 8. Given our release policy, that
> is supported until 10 is released.
It didn't have the local patch that Kamil wants to remove, so no change
there - but if we can fix it there too that would be a
Great to hear of progress.
I don't see why we don't care about 8. Given our release policy, that
is supported until 10 is released.
On 27.03.2020 18:42, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 06:36:29PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>> I tested the code without our local patch as mentioned in my commit,
>> even in the snapshot 1 commit before jak@'s change.
>>
>> In all the cases I get P_tmpdir defined and pointing t
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 06:36:29PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> I tested the code without our local patch as mentioned in my commit,
> even in the snapshot 1 commit before jak@'s change.
>
> In all the cases I get P_tmpdir defined and pointing to "/tmp/".
>
> I have not tested it on NetBSD-8
On 27.03.2020 18:24, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 06:14:24PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>> On 27.03.2020 16:01, Martin Husemann wrote:
>>> Which compiler version did you test?
>>>
>>
>> I tested on NetBSD HEAD GCC style distribution as host.
>
> Not sure I understand. You ne
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 06:14:24PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 27.03.2020 16:01, Martin Husemann wrote:
> > Which compiler version did you test?
> >
>
> I tested on NetBSD HEAD GCC style distribution as host.
Not sure I understand. You need to test the in-tree build with the change
backed
On 27.03.2020 16:01, Martin Husemann wrote:
> Which compiler version did you test?
>
I tested on NetBSD HEAD GCC style distribution as host.
$ uname -rms
NetBSD 9.99.51 amd64
> I see this on netbsd-8:
>
>> echo $TMPDIR
> TMPDIR: Undefined variable.
>> ktrace -i $TOOLDIR/bin/x86_64--netbsd-gcc b
Which compiler version did you test?
I see this on netbsd-8:
> echo $TMPDIR
TMPDIR: Undefined variable.
> ktrace -i $TOOLDIR/bin/x86_64--netbsd-gcc base64.c
[..]
> kdump | fgrep tmp
[..]
19418 1 collect2 NAMI "/var/tmp//ccs9D5nv.le"
19418 1 collect2 NAMI "/var/tmp//ccs9D5nv.le"
89
I've found out that this patch in not needed, at least on NetBSD and
likely Linux.
The algorithm to pick tmpdir is as follows:
- check for memoized tmpdir
- try env variables
- try P_tmpdir
- try /var/tmp, then /usr/tmp, then /tmp
- fallback to current dir ('.')
- save memoized tmpdir
P_tmp
13 matches
Mail list logo
