Re: CVS commit: src/usr.sbin/puffs/rump_smbfs

2009-09-18 Thread David Laight
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 09:05:38AM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote: People are most welcome to fix this ugliness properly by helping to get rid of link sets in the kernel. I'm glad you agree that link sets are ugly. On the matter of a getting rid of them I did offer to discuss a solution, but

Re: CVS commit: src/usr.sbin/puffs/rump_smbfs

2009-09-18 Thread Jason Thorpe
On Sep 18, 2009, at 9:10 AM, David Laight wrote: It is all rather similar to the proliferation of memory pools - for things where 'malloc' would be fine. The old-school kernel malloc was almost never fine ... but pools have another advantage -- use of a direct-mapped segment on

Re: CVS commit: src/usr.sbin/puffs/rump_smbfs

2009-09-13 Thread Antti Kantee
On Fri Sep 11 2009 at 06:48:50 +, Nick Hudson wrote: Module Name: src Committed By: skrll Date: Fri Sep 11 06:48:50 UTC 2009 Modified Files: src/usr.sbin/puffs/rump_smbfs: Makefile Log Message: Allow this to build while link sets and rump are broken. Hi Nick, In the