On 8/13/20 18:20, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Martin Guy writes:
>
>> On 31/07/2020, Måns Rullgård wrote:
- if (end) memset(p->window, 0, sizeof(p->window));
+ if (end) memset(p->window, 0, sizeof(*(p->window)) * p->dft_size);
>>> This memset is short by one element.
>> It is. Many thanks
On 8/2/20 12:52, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Måns Rullgård writes:
>
>>> + if (stat->fft_average) {
>>> + for (i = 0; i < samples / 2; i++) /* FIXME: should be <= samples
>>> / 2 */
>>> + fprintf(stderr, " %f %f\n", ffa * i, re_average[i] / len);
>>> + }
>> I don't un
easy and,
hopefully, a new version of Sox can be released in 2016.
That would be nice just before the holiday season. Who has experience
with setting up PPA's?
Best,
Pander
--
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeo
On 28 January 2016 15:47:22 CET, Markus Glugla
wrote:
>Am Donnerstag, den 28.01.2016, 14:00 +0100 schrieb Pander:
>> On 01/28/2016 01:51 PM, Markus Glugla wrote:
>> > Am Mittwoch, den 20.01.2016, 03:37 +0100 schrieb Thor Andreassen:
>> >> On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 0
On 01/28/2016 01:51 PM, Markus Glugla wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 20.01.2016, 03:37 +0100 schrieb Thor Andreassen:
>> On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 03:31:18PM +0100, Markus Glugla wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>
>> Hi Markus
>>
>>> I read the spectrogram threads and affiliate a request. I'm using
>>> sometimes sox spe
Let me know when you start working on it. It is very tricky and I am
willing to be a critical tester if you want.
On 01/23/2016 12:54 AM, Thor Andreassen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:33:19PM +0100, Pander wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> Note that if your output from sox is s
On 01/20/2016 03:37 AM, Thor Andreassen wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 03:31:18PM +0100, Markus Glugla wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> Hi Markus
>
>> I read the spectrogram threads and affiliate a request. I'm using
>> sometimes sox spectrogram to get an spectral overview of various
>> measurement datas. Bu
On 12/19/2015 12:12 PM, Eric Wong wrote:
> Pander wrote:
>> Because of a question on the users list, I would like to ask how to move
>> forward the following patch and documentation?
>
> I guess the real sox developers are still busy...
> I suppose I'll start pu
:
https://sourceforge.net/p/sox/mailman/message/33625255/
Please let me know how I can help to move this forward.
Thanks,
Pander
--
___
SoX-devel mailing list
SoX-devel
png
When using averages over multiple power spectra, is it wise to ignore
the last one? Is there a way to calculate when the DFT fits exactly and
the last one doesn't have to be ignored? Can automatic notification this
be part of so
On 01/01/2015 09:23 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Dec 22 19:21:10, ch...@cnpbagwell.com wrote:
>> A new release candidate has been released
>
> There seems to be a bug in the spectrogram effect,
> also present in earlier releases.
>
> $ sox -c 1 -b 16 -r 1000 -n file.wav synth 1 sin 440 gain -3
>
Hi all,
Could some please tell me of my patch for average power spectrum has
been accepted or not?
I want to send in more patches but only if this one is accepted so I
don't use the wrong way of providing patched.
Thanks,
P
On 12/23/2014 12:02 AM, Cedric Roux wrote:
> On 12/22/2014 11:14 PM, Eric Wong wrote:
>> ...otherwise, free may be called on an uninitialized value:
>>
>>> + if (re_average) {
>>> +free(re_average);
>>> + }
>
> Just for you information,
> if a pointer is null free(p) is fine and does nothing
On 12/22/2014 11:14 PM, Eric Wong wrote:
> Pander wrote:
>> Please review the attached patch for outputting the average power spectrum.
>
> I am not knowledgable in the math behind this, but I noticed one
> memory management error:
>
>> @@ -134,6 +138,15 @@ static int
Hi all,
Please review the attached patch for outputting the average power spectrum.
For many applications I need to calculate this with additional tools.
This patch will make SoX do it directly.
Regards,
Pander
>From 261b4fb8cc9f8f98e0044e973a81e7a367349339 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
F
15 matches
Mail list logo
