On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 18:39:51 +0100
Jacques Rebourcier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le Tuesday 13 November 2007 10:00:11 Souvarine, vous avez écrit :
> > Pyrex 0.6.3 look kind of old. I have 0.9.4.1. You should get the latest
> > version from Pyrex official web site and compile it yourself (don't
Le Tuesday 13 November 2007 10:00:11 Souvarine, vous avez écrit :
> Pyrex 0.6.3 look kind of old. I have 0.9.4.1. You should get the latest
> version from Pyrex official web site and compile it yourself (don't worry,
> compiling pyrex is way easier than compiling soya).
>
sorry its a typo i used
Pyrex 0.6.3 look kind of old. I have 0.9.4.1. You should get the latest
version from Pyrex official web site and compile it yourself (don't
worry, compiling pyrex is way easier than compiling soya).
Anyway, I don't believe that pyrex would dynamically generate this
ode_check file. I've searche
No one to explain me where ode_check.h is supposed to come from ?
Dynamically generated by pyrex ?
Provided by ode ?
Hand coded and added by someone into Soya svn ?
Am i the only one who have build problem with pyrex 0.6.3 and actual svn ?
Thanks
Jacques
Le Sunday 11 November 2007 18:52:53 Jac
Hi all,
I found this mail from Greg Ewin, with pacthes where I can find some reference
to "ode_check.h".
http://www.mail-archive.com/soya-user@gna.org/msg01221.html
Actually, seems to me that ode_check.h is something coming from soya
repository, but can't find it in svn, do you have this file
