Look in http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec.
In the api_scripts dir you see set_custom_info* and RHNSession. Rename
set_custom_info* to /usr/local/sbin/set_custom_info. Put RHNSession.pm in
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl. You'll to create a file called
/etc/satellite_api.conf. Give this file a mod
Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
According the code the the returned version is content of web.version
/etc/rhn/default/rhn_web.conf
I see as best option to create new config option web.apiversion which we
bump up independently on spacewalk version. And ideally return it back to
5
Sorry about that. I've renamed the scripts to *_txt, just strip the _txt off
the names.
CC
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 20 November 2008 8:00 PM
To: Coe, Colin C. (Unix Engineer)
Subject: RE: [Spacewalk-devel] Kickstart scri
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:25:36PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Jesus M. Rodriguez wrote:
>>> Miroslav Suchý wrote:
According the code the the returned version is content of web.version
/etc/rhn/default/rhn_web.conf
I see as best option to create new config option web.apiversion wh
Jesus Rodriguez wrote:
Why 10.0? Seems really arbitrary. If that was the intent, I can live
with it.
If we make is 5.2, people can expected that Satellite 5.3 will have API
5.3, whereas it will meantime bump up to 6.5 or something like that.
I take it as explicitly notice - api version has now
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Jesus Rodriguez wrote:
Why 10.0? Seems really arbitrary. If that was the intent, I can live
with it.
If we make is 5.2, people can expected that Satellite 5.3 will have
API 5.3, whereas it will meantime bump up to 6.5 or something like that.
I take it as explicitly notic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:43:39 -0500
Brad Buckingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am, however, a little unclear on the proposed bumping of the API
> version. Is it necessary to bump it for each API that added during
> the course of a development cyc
Devan Goodwin wrote:
The reason that I ask is that we don't bump the Spacewalk version for
every change that is submitted to it. I also suspect that over time
Why?
many folks will forget to bump the API version as they submit changes
to the APIs, so the might become less reliable/useful.
Th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Saw this come across an RSS feed somewhere last night, looks very good
and easy to read. Thought it might be of interest to some of our devs:
http://book.git-scm.com/
Lots of good stuff on git usage and it's internals in relatively
straightforward la
Mike McCune wrote:
Anyone fixing these:
Test Result
Violations
Previous Build
Test Result
2 failures (+1)
2,310 tests (+1)
All Failed Tests
com.redhat.rhn.frontend.xmlrpc.org.trusts.test.OrgTrustHandlerTest.testBaseTrusts
com.redhat.rhn.frontend.action.errata.test.ChannelActio
10 matches
Mail list logo
