Re: [Spacewalk-devel] upstreaming some of our .spec file changes

2013-08-06 Thread Jan Pazdziora
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 05:28:09PM -0600, Lamont Peterson wrote: > [snip] > > Well, discussions about renaming all tools and packages to spacewalk- > > pop up from time to time for many years ;). > > Althought we mostly agree with renaming comandline tools (assuming that > > old names will remain

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] upstreaming some of our .spec file changes

2013-08-06 Thread Lamont Peterson
[snip] > Well, discussions about renaming all tools and packages to spacewalk- > pop up from time to time for many years ;). > Althought we mostly agree with renaming comandline tools (assuming that > old names will remain at least as symlinks for compatibility reasons) > we've decided not to rena

Re: [Spacewalk-devel] upstreaming some of our .spec file changes

2013-08-06 Thread Michael Mraka
% >> Running vanilla Spacewalk on SUSE would be a big effort and %ifdefs in % >> the spec files (like they are in our tree. /srv/www vs /var/www anyone) % > % > Why didn't you send those %ifdefs for review? If this is the only % > thing which blocks you do do Spacewalk vanilla releases on SUSE, I

[Spacewalk-devel] upstreaming some of our .spec file changes

2013-08-01 Thread Duncan Mac-Vicar P.
On 01/08/13 10:05, Jan Pazdziora wrote: >> Running vanilla Spacewalk on SUSE would be a big effort and %ifdefs in >> the spec files (like they are in our tree. /srv/www vs /var/www anyone) > > Why didn't you send those %ifdefs for review? If this is the only > thing which blocks you do do Spacewa