I guess I'm wondering why we have to jump through hoops to get the
errata to sync. When you add a channel why didn't RH just make it so
you can point at the higher level and get errata and everything. It
just seems like if this were really supposed to be enterprise-level
software that it would ha
So I now seem to be getting these reports (this were trickling in even prior to
the 0.7 upgrade).
So do I only receive failures? I want a summary report that will show available
updates by Channel,System etc
Is there a way to run these reports ad-hoc?
Thanks,
Rich
-Original Message-
Yeah, it looks like the packages are not there.
I copied this channel from another channel and deleted the old channel.
I'm guessing the packages or link there to, got deleted at that time as
well. I'm in the progress of pushing the packages to the server again.
-Rob
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 12:4
I had a similar problem with rhel5.4 packages that had been rhn_pushed from a
mounted iso. Turned out the iso failed the md5checksum ... when I downloaded a
new one - it worked just fine.
-Original Message-
From: spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com
[mailto:spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.
Robert Kuropkat wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 08:46 -0500, Justin Sherrill wrote:
>> Robert Kuropkat wrote:
>>> okay, I may be jumping ahead here, but I created a channel and child
>>> channel in spacewalk. I was then able to boot from DVD and point it at
>>> the kickstart file in spacewalk. I t
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 08:46 -0500, Justin Sherrill wrote:
> Robert Kuropkat wrote:
> > okay, I may be jumping ahead here, but I created a channel and child
> > channel in spacewalk. I was then able to boot from DVD and point it at
> > the kickstart file in spacewalk. I thought this meant I had en
Robert Kuropkat wrote:
> okay, I may be jumping ahead here, but I created a channel and child
> channel in spacewalk. I was then able to boot from DVD and point it at
> the kickstart file in spacewalk. I thought this meant I had enough done
> to create a bootable iso. Cobbler has a buildiso opti
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 08:26:42PM -0600, Daniel Wittenberg wrote:
> Wouldn't this whole errata management be easier if you could point it at
> a repo and have it one level higher, so it could see the OS and the
> updates, and just mirror those over itself? It seems like this is way
> more complic
It certainly sounds like it. Will put proper reproduction steps when I get
some spare time this afternoon now I know how to successfully reproduce it.
2009/12/9 Michael Mraka
> James Hogarth wrote:
> % Hmm... reproduced it and not sure the best way of dealing with it at this
> % point
> %
James Hogarth wrote:
% Hmm... reproduced it and not sure the best way of dealing with it at this
% point
%
% After a silly thing (thankfully this was early in the process of getting
% systems subscribed to the server so not much loss) I had to rebuild the
% spacewalk repo yesterday.
%
% Sync'
Dear Thomas,
Issuer: C=CH, ST=Bern, L=Bern, O=domain.local, OU=domain.local,
CN=spacewalk2.domain.local
Validity
Not Before: Dec 5 00:38:00 2008 GMT
Not After : Dec 5 00:38:02 2036 GMT
Subject: C=CH, ST=Bern, O=domain.local, OU=domain.local,
CN=spac
Hmm... reproduced it and not sure the best way of dealing with it at this
point
After a silly thing (thankfully this was early in the process of getting
systems subscribed to the server so not much loss) I had to rebuild the
spacewalk repo yesterday.
Sync'd the repos overnight and found the f
12 matches
Mail list logo
