Thanks Colin and David for the clarification. It basically sounds like
the four GB limit will get you enough to support roughly two branches
of your chosen EL flavor, say centos 5.x i386 & x86_64 or SL 4.x
x86_64 & SL 5.x x86_64 or whatever it is your environment requires.
Jeff
Sent from
On this, can I ask the dev's how the Postgres port is progressing?
The status pages haven't been updated for a lomg while and there's
been little related traffic on the spacewalk-devel mailing list. (Not
hassling or criticising, just want to know when I can toss Oracle.)
CC
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010
Correct, if I remember right, we pushed Scientific Linux 5 64bit (base,
security updates, and bugfixes) and CERN Linux 5 64 bit (base and updates) to
our spacewalk server with no problems. But when we started to do Fedora 12
(Everything, and updates) we passed the 4GB limit.
Dave
David Glaser
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Jeff Hefner wrote:
> I'm curious how big of a deployment would force the need to move up to the
> full database. Is it on the scale of a few hundred systems or more like
> thousands?
>
> Jeff
>
I'd suggest it has more to do with the number and size software
chann
I'm curious how big of a deployment would force the need to move up
to the full database. Is it on the scale of a few hundred systems or
more like thousands?
Jeff
On Mar 24, 2010, at 8:44 AM, Mike Hanby wrote:
Thanks Michael and David,
I'll give this a go.
Mike
-Original Message--
I've been following this list for a while and have seen some other
posts where the problem was XE's 4gb limit. What does that limit
translate in the real world
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 24, 2010, at 8:44 AM, Mike Hanby wrote:
Thanks Michael and David,
I'll give this a go.
Mike
-Or
For Satellite I always recommend:
- REAL HARDWARE (don't virtualise)
- at least two cores (4 cores preferred)
- at least 4gb RAM (8gb preferred)
- at least 100gb HDD (depends on number of channels to be sync'ed)
My experience was that moring Oracle to a different box caused about a
30% drop in per
- "Russ Lavoy" wrote:
> I am wondering what the hardware requirements are for Spacewalk? I
> would like to have the Spacewalk application and the oracle DB
> separate for load separation.
Feel free to look at the RHN Satellite hardware requirements ...
http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_H
Thanks, but it didn't answer my main question.
I know I will go over the 4G limit of Oracle XE with the amount of Linux
systems we have, hence the reason for the buying Oracle license comment.
The main question I have is this...
What kind of Proc, RAM and disk capacity do I need to run the spac
This worked as automagically as advertised. Thanks!
Kris Knigga
kris.d.kni...@fisglobal.com <--- New email address!
-Original Message-
From: Miroslav Suchý [mailto:msu...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 3:03 AM
To: spacewalk-list@redhat.com
Cc: Knigga, Kris D
Subject: Re
Oracle XE is free. If you buy the commercial Satellite it comes with
the Oracle cost included.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 24, 2010, at 9:28 AM, Russ Lavoy wrote:
I am wondering what the hardware requirements are for Spacewalk? I
would like to have the Spacewalk application and the oracle
I am wondering what the hardware requirements are for Spacewalk? I would like
to have the Spacewalk application and the oracle DB separate for load
separation.
Can anyone give me the required specs? I can assume, but since this is going
to take buying an oracle license I want it to be accurat
Thanks Michael and David,
I'll give this a go.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com
[mailto:spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mraka
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 3:42 AM
To: spacewalk-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] Change f
I saw this as recently as 0.6, and in the very near past upgraded from 0.6 ->
0.8 (by way of 0.7). I haven't seen this issue since the upgrade to 0.8.
-Original Message-
From: spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com
[mailto:spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of josh.mul...@cox.com
S
> [r...@mirr ~]# /usr/bin/spacewalk-repo-sync --channel epel-5.4-i386 --url
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/5/i386 --type yum --label
> epel-5.4-i386
> RHN 31624 2010/03/24 06:54:56 +02:00: ('Connection attempt failed', 1033,
> 'ORA-01033: ORACLE initialization or shutdown in progress\
On 03/23/2010 08:41 PM, Knigga, Kris D wrote:
Hello, all.
I currently have a Spacewalk server set up with a few clients connected
directly to it over a WAN link. In order to put less stress on the WAN link,
I'd like to move the clients from being directly connected to being connected
through
16 matches
Mail list logo
