I have not seen any answers to the below questions. If you have any ideas
please let me know. Thank you for your time and have a great day.
On Dec 21, 2010, at 11:06 AM, JDFire wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I have been trying to get client failover to work but it seems that the
> client is unable
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Nicolas Antonio Corrarello
wrote:
> Guys,
> Have anyone tested Spacewalk on large enviroments (4000+)? I mean, is there
> any documented limit? Or have any of you found any performance issue scaling
> with Spacewalk?
>
> thx
>
> nac
>
I'm guessing you mean 4000+ se
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:47 PM, A Robinson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Has anyone got a script that pulls info from the Fedora Update System
> -- similar to the one for centos errata at
> http://www.bioss.ac.uk/staff/davidn/spacewalk-stuff/ ? If not I'll
> look at writing/modifying the centos one myself.
Guys,
Have anyone tested Spacewalk on large enviroments (4000+)? I mean, is there
any documented limit? Or have any of you found any performance issue scaling
with Spacewalk?
thx
nac
___
Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
https://www.
> You are installing 64bit version of oracle-lib-compat but you have 32bit
> InstantClient package installed. Please use 64bit version of InstantClient.
Jan, Colin:
Thanks. Right on the money.
Also I figured out my initial problem by reading the correct guide:
"Note that Oracle does not like c
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 3:25 AM, Aaron Prayther wrote:
> Do you have a brief that shows why you want satellite over just using
> rhn?
>
> A feature comparison. Examples of use. Or anything like that.
>
> Thanks for any info. Looked all around redhat.com and could not find
> anything.
>
>
> Aaron
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/03/2011 08:03 AM, Koivunen Mikko wrote:
> Hi all. Just to notify that I have today upgraded to Spacewalk 1.2 and
> now the package is correctly visible in the UI as well. So it seems the
> upgrade somehow resolved the issue.
If this happens agai
satellite allows for configuration management by having custom /etc/
files for different classes of system.
rhn is for package updates.
On 01/06/2011 02:25 PM, Aaron Prayther wrote:
> Do you have a brief that shows why you want satellite over just using
> rhn?
>
> A feature comparison. Examples
Do you have a brief that shows why you want satellite over just using
rhn?
A feature comparison. Examples of use. Or anything like that.
Thanks for any info. Looked all around redhat.com and could not find
anything.
Aaron Prayther
___
Spacewalk-l
Hello,
Has anyone got a script that pulls info from the Fedora Update System
-- similar to the one for centos errata at
http://www.bioss.ac.uk/staff/davidn/spacewalk-stuff/ ? If not I'll
look at writing/modifying the centos one myself.
___
Spacewalk-lis
Just trying to de-niggle this upgraded CentOS 5.5 Spacewalk 1.2 server.
rhncfg-client-5.9.33-1.el5 failed with startswith error. As per list
suggestion I ugpraded to the latest nightly client, which cleared that fault.
I updated these packages on the client (server is a fully updated 1.2), tryin
11 matches
Mail list logo
