On 5/3/10 11:45 AM, Hugo Doria wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I updated my spacewalk server to 1.0. Then i installed a new server.
> When i try to register this new server i get the following message:
>
> cc95
> An error has occurred:
>
> Error Class Code: 21
> Error Class Info: Invalid arguments passed
On 5/5/10 9:18 AM, Gintaras wrote:
> Thanks, registration is working after the patch, but scheduled updates
> still fails with 1.0.0 client:
>
> 'Fatal error in Python code occured [[6]]'
>
> On the Client in up2date.log:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/sbin/rhn_check", lin
Thanks, registration is working after the patch, but scheduled updates
still fails with 1.0.0 client:
'Fatal error in Python code occured [[6]]'
On the Client in up2date.log:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/sbin/rhn_check", line 283, in __run_action
(status, message, data) =
patch works fine here :-)
Jan Pazdziora wrote:
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 02:03:49PM +0200, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 01:29:34PM +0200, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 12:38:12PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
I did that change after talking to Mirek
Patch worked like a charm.
Thanks.
-- Hugo Doria
___
Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 02:03:49PM +0200, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 01:29:34PM +0200, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> > On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 12:38:12PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > >
> > > >I did that change after talking to Mirek who (IIRC) did the bump to 2
> > > >and change
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 01:29:34PM +0200, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 12:38:12PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > >
> > >I did that change after talking to Mirek who (IIRC) did the bump to 2
> > >and change of the parameters type from list to hash as part of the
> > >"rpm install
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 12:38:12PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >
> >I did that change after talking to Mirek who (IIRC) did the bump to 2
> >and change of the parameters type from list to hash as part of the
> >"rpm installation date" feature. We primarily did that for Fedoras,
> >but the worst
Jan Pazdziora wrote:
Could you show the output of
rpm -qf /usr/share/rhn/up2date_client/rhnserver.py
?
Same problem here after updating from 0.8 to 1.0.
[r...@i5sw ~]# rpm -qf /usr/share/rhn/up2date_client/rhnserver.py
rhn-client-tools-1.0.0-1.el5
--
Waldemar Gorus|
On 05/05/2010 12:34 PM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 04:27:35PM -0400, Justin Sherrill wrote:
So i narrowed the issue down to this commit:
http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=spacewalk.git;a=commit;h=015c750daa164e80cca51bd683270fa1f91352ad
Basically cfg['supportsExtendedPackag
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 04:27:35PM -0400, Justin Sherrill wrote:
>
> So i narrowed the issue down to this commit:
>
> http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=spacewalk.git;a=commit;h=015c750daa164e80cca51bd683270fa1f91352ad
>
> Basically cfg['supportsExtendedPackageProfile'] is 1 when it should be 2.
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 12:45:00PM -0300, Hugo Doria wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I updated my spacewalk server to 1.0. Then i installed a new server.
> When i try to register this new server i get the following message:
>
> cc95
> An error has occurred:
>
> Error Class Code: 21
> Error Class Info: Inv
Are you guys seeing errors in the /var/log/rhn/rhn_server_xmlrpc.log ?
Dan
On May 4, 2010, at 2:31 PM, Bruce Pennypacker wrote:
> I'm getting exactly the same thing as others have posted. My call to
> rhnreg_ks, the error messages, etc. are all identical. The only thing I'll
> add is that e
On 5/3/10 11:45 AM, Hugo Doria wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I updated my spacewalk server to 1.0. Then i installed a new server.
> When i try to register this new server i get the following message:
>
> cc95
> An error has occurred:
>
> Error Class Code: 21
> Error Class Info: Invalid arguments passed
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Bruce Pennypacker
wrote:
> I'm getting exactly the same thing as others have posted. My call to
> rhnreg_ks, the error messages, etc. are all identical. The only thing I'll
> add is that each time I run it I do get a new entry for the client in my
> Systems list.
I'm getting exactly the same thing as others have posted. My call to
rhnreg_ks, the error messages, etc. are all identical. The only thing
I'll add is that each time I run it I do get a new entry for the client
in my Systems list. Each entry contains a full hardware profile but no
packages.
Hugo Doria
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 10:09 AM
To: josh.mul...@cox.com; spacewalk-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] Can't register a client with spacewalk 1.0
Here's the command:
rhnreg_ks --serverUrl=http://myserver.mydomain.com/XMLRPC
--activationkey=1-mykey
Here's the command:
rhnreg_ks --serverUrl=http://myserver.mydomain.com/XMLRPC
--activationkey=1-mykey
--
Hugo Doria
http://www.hugodoria.org
http://www.secureinfo.com.br
___
Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/
Please give the full rhnreg_ks command that's causing this error.
Thanks
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 11:45 -0400, Hugo Doria wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I updated my spacewalk server to 1.0. Then i installed a new server.
> When i try to register this new server i get the following message:
>
> cc95
>
Hi guys,
I updated my spacewalk server to 1.0. Then i installed a new server.
When i try to register this new server i get the following message:
cc95
An error has occurred:
Error Class Code: 21
Error Class Info: Invalid arguments passed to function.
Explanation:
An error has occurred while
20 matches
Mail list logo
