On 04/21/2011 06:08 PM, William S. wrote:
> The issue is that we need to be able to provision hosts in each site, as I
> understand it, proxy would not have the kickstart/DHCPD capability. It is
> enough to do rpm distribution, we need to be able to provision hosts as
> well. If the proxy isn't cap
ewalk-list-
boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Miroslav Suchý
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 8:55 AM
To: spacewalk-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] Spacewalk proxy servers
On 04/21/2011 05:43 PM, William S. wrote:
We're going to use spacewalk in the hub and spoke mo
@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] Spacewalk proxy servers
>
> On 04/21/2011 05:43 PM, William S. wrote:
> > We're going to use spacewalk in the hub and spoke model. That being
> > said, what are the limitations to the proxy servers? Is it possible to
> > run S
On 04/21/2011 05:43 PM, William S. wrote:
> We're going to use spacewalk in the hub and spoke model. That being said,
> what are the limitations to the proxy servers? Is it possible to run
> Spacewalk master server in a distributed model in multiple geographical
> locations? This would be like a Ma
We're going to use spacewalk in the hub and spoke model. That being said,
what are the limitations to the proxy servers? Is it possible to run
Spacewalk master server in a distributed model in multiple geographical
locations? This would be like a Master/Master model where the main server
will distr
