On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:17:05AM -0800, John McCoy wrote:
> Hey Andy thanks for the reply.
>
> RE: apply RHEL errata to CentOS: Ya I tend to do things a little
> differently, but I normally get there. CentOS is typically used for
> "customers" and getting them to apply patches is as we all know
Hey Andy thanks for the reply.
RE: apply RHEL errata to CentOS: Ya I tend to do things a little
differently, but I normally get there. CentOS is typically used for
"customers" and getting them to apply patches is as we all know
painful at best so being able to know
Hi John,
Let's see if'n I can't clarify things for you... see below.
> After upgrading to 1.6 I decided to give clone-errata another try.
> I managed to have some success with version .2 getting my CentOS 5 x64
> base channel errata working.
> Couldn't get any others to work though, then I discov
After upgrading to 1.6 I decided to give clone-errata another try.
I managed to have some success with version .2 getting my CentOS 5 x64
base channel errata working.
Couldn't get any others to work though, then I discovered that
clone-errata was up to ver 0.9
I'm now getting more errata publi