On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 08:34:26AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: jm
> Date: Mon Mar 15 00:34:25 2004
> New Revision: 9490
>
> Modified:
>incubator/spamassassin/trunk/MANIFEST
> Log:
> moved hashcash code into a plugin (bug 3170)
>
> Modified: incubator/spamassassin/trunk/MANIFEST
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3179
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-15 13:08 ---
additional failures...
t/rule_namesFound anti-pattern: P_229 = GUARANTEE,
# Failed test 257 in SATest.pm at line 501
Found anti-patter
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3179
Summary: failures in tests
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3178
Summary: Add spelling variant "re-finance" to phrases
Product: Spamassassin
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
P
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3177
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-15 11:56 ---
Created an attachment (id=1845)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=1845&action=view)
Message from cnet.com
--- You are receiving this
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3177
Summary: Add a default blacklist_from for news.com
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enha
Getting lots of this from mass-check, also by running ./spamassassin
in a build tree (ie no install):
Failed to run T_HASHCASH_22 SpamAssassin test, skipping:
(Can't locate object method "check_hashcash_value" via package
"Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at
/home/parker/
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2912
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-15 10:49 ---
Subject: Re: [review] RFE: allow test order to be controlling using a test
'priority' setting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>The check on the
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2912
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-15 10:15 ---
Subject: Re: [review] RFE: allow test order to be controlling using a test
'priority' setting
Well, I found a problem with the plugin interaction. Specifically
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3175
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-15 09:35 ---
The following are working well for me. Shorter versions are trapping on far
too much ham.
Contrary to one of your assumptions, in the last few weeks poison bl
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2372
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|NEEDCLA: sa-learn: mbx |sa-learn: mbx mailbox
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3175
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-15 07:46 ---
Two changes.
1) Rules look for fixed numbers of words
2) Just lowercase
body SH_bayes_poison_lower_6_4 /(?:[a-z]{4,}\s+){6}/
describe SH_bayes_poison_
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2912
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-15 07:43 ---
How difficult would it be to implement short-circuiting too?
It seems if we are changing the way we order tests, it wouldn't be too hard to
run all negative tests
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3173
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-15 07:08 ---
I commented above (Comment 2) that invisible text is not being ignored
for classification but is being ignored (as intended) for learning.
Actually, I don't think
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3176
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #1843 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3175
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-15 06:55 ---
That other bug (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3023
) seeks to tackle the issue of bayes poison generically. The rules below seek
to address a
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3176
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-15 06:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=1843)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=1843&action=view)
Proposed fix.
--- You are receiving this mail be
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3176
Summary: Invisible text that should be ignored is not.
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severi
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3175
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-15 06:50 ---
Subject: Re: New: Possible Rules to defeat "bayes poison" word blocks
On [03/15/04 06:28], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3175
Summary: Possible Rules to defeat "bayes poison" word blocks
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 2.63
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2427
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #1380 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2427
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-15 04:34 ---
Well, the file is about six months old, based on corpus results from back
then. Since we are testing the rules, I'll go ahead a make a new one on fresh
data.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2912
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-15 00:49 ---
Asside from the negative-priority thing, as noted by Justin, +1 from me.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3170
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3173
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-14 23:25 ---
As I see it from examining spam, there are two kinds (generally) of invisible
text in the messages. Type 1 is a whole lot of "words", doubtless intended as
Baye
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 10:01:01PM -0800, Kelsey Cummings wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 07:02:08PM -0600, Michael Parker wrote:
> > Me as well, guess it was just temporary. Anyone know what happens to
> > mail sent to the bugzilla alias when it's down? Does it disappear?
>
> I can't answer th
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 07:02:08PM -0600, Michael Parker wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 04:43:53PM +, Matthew Cline wrote:
> > On Monday 15 March 2004 12:30 am, Michael Parker wrote:
> > > Bugzilla appears to be having some issues.
> > >
> > > Michael
> >
> > Works for me.
> >
>
> Me as we
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2912
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-14 21:51 ---
Subject: Re: [review] RFE: allow test order to be controlling using a test
'priority' setting
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 08:12:49PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2906
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-14 21:23 ---
ok, added a test -- this seems to be fixed in 3.0.0.
Regarding avoiding DYNABLOCK hits for authenticated users -- I suggest adding a
test like:
header MYAUTH
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1923
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3169
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-14 21:04 ---
yeah, I'm sure we're misparsing something in a lot of these cases.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2146
Bug 2146 depends on bug 1908, which changed state.
Bug 1908 Summary: ConfSourceSQL: Postgres @GLOBAL overrides user prefs
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1908
What|Old Value |New Value
---
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1908
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2912
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-14 20:13 ---
oh yeah, otherwise +1, looks good!
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2912
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-14 20:12 ---
two things:
1. I think check_tick() will need to be called more often -- best thing to do is
check this in and we can worry about that afterwards.
2. I notice th
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3173
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-14 19:59 ---
Subject: Re: Bayes can be circumvented by faking invisible or near-invisible
text.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > BTW -- it's 150, not 15
>
> Oh, Paul Graham and DSPAM used 15 (later up to 20 to 25). That's an
> interesting difference.
Yeah -- experimentally verified in "bayes tweaks round 1" if I recall
correctly ;) Spambayes fou
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2912
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|RFE: allow test order to be |[review] RFE: allow test
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2912
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #1832 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3173
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-14 18:35 ---
> BTW -- it's 150, not 15
Oh, Paul Graham and DSPAM used 15 (later up to 20 to 25). That's an interesting
difference.
> I suggest reading the "Dobly" paper befor
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2912
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-14 18:06 ---
Subject: Re: RFE: allow test order to be controlling using a test 'priority'
setting
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 01:18:41PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Whi
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 04:43:53PM +, Matthew Cline wrote:
> On Monday 15 March 2004 12:30 am, Michael Parker wrote:
> > Bugzilla appears to be having some issues.
> >
> > Michael
>
> Works for me.
>
Me as well, guess it was just temporary. Anyone know what happens to
mail sent to the bugzi
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3174
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3173
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-14 16:53 ---
Subject: Re: Bayes can be circumvented by faking invisible or near-invisible
text.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>Setting a limit on the numb
On Monday 15 March 2004 12:30 am, Michael Parker wrote:
> Bugzilla appears to be having some issues.
>
> Michael
Works for me.
--
Give a man a match, and he'll be warm for a minute, but set him on
fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Advanced SPAM filtering software: http://spamass
Bugzilla appears to be having some issues.
Michael
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3173
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-03-14 16:17 ---
> We *know* already...
My argument is that for now we should not omit seemingly invisible text, at
least for now, because it would be too easy to fake.
--
47 matches
Mail list logo
