http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3534
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-22 16:21 ---
Thanks for your help.
> How did you do the build? What parameters got passed to the Makefile.PL?
I used the exact description of the INSTALL file:
perl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
BTW, that ROCAC technique (ie. area under ROC curve) for getting a useful
single figure from a pair of FP/FN figures seems very promising Dan,
weren't you drawing graphs along those lines at some stage last year?
- --j.
Henry Stern writes:
> Th
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3534
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-22 15:11 ---
Subject: Re: New: Use of uninitialized value in concatenation with
BayesStore.pm and Bayes.pm when installed non-system wide (SA 3.0.0-pre1)
On Tue, Jun 22, 200
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3533
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS/Version|Linux |All
--- Additional Comments
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3314
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-22 15:01 ---
This bug might be related to:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3534
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3534
Summary: Use of uninitialized value in concatenation with
BayesStore.pm and Bayes.pm when installed non-system
wide (SA 3.0.0-pre1)
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trun
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3533
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-22 14:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=2060)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2060&action=view)
suggested patch
I've never even looked at these scripts
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3533
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component|Buildi
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3533
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spamassassin-
|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3533
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-22 14:24 ---
Subject: Re: RPM install wants Mail::SpamAssassin::NoMailAudit
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 02:15:43PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is a build of SA 3.0-pre
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3533
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.1.0 |3.0.0
--- Additional Comment
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3533
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-22 14:15 ---
Created an attachment (id=2059)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2059&action=view)
Log of RPM build
This is a build of SA 3.0-pre1, symlin
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3533
Summary: RPM install wants Mail::SpamAssassin::NoMailAudit
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Seve
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 02:21:21PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> What exactly do you mean by support? I could use Windows, and I'd have
> support, but I choose not to, and I run linux without support. Hasn't
> bothered me one bit...
Both "the company making Jira will give updates/help with issues
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 04:52 CET Daniel Quinlan wrote:
>[...]
> 1. firm age limits:
>- no ham older than 12 months
I still have a problem with this rule. For example do I have some mail in my
corpus my uncle (who's an MD) hand-sorted for me more than a year ago.
While the software might hav
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 10:53 CET PieterB wrote:
> Can anybody give me some hints how to further debug this problem?
> I'm not a SpamAssassin/perl guru, so help is appreciated. Should
> I file a bug report?
Yes, please. Else it will most probably slip out of our view. The worst
thing which can h
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 01:13:44AM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 10:55:47AM +1200, Sidney Markowitz wrote:
> > On the other hand, if somebody at Apache is taking care of setting it
> > all up and using it is as easy as what we are doing now with Bugzilla,
> > it would no
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3532
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3514
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-22 10:36 ---
Has anyone noticed that the rule used is a "body" rule, but the message text
that's missed is a URI?
Yo Mismo, can you try using "uri" as your ruletype instead of
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3532
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-22 10:29 ---
If you need to limit the number of processes, look at using the -m parameter.
Without it, you'll get exactly the behavior you describe.
If that does not fix your
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3524
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-22 10:15 ---
Subject: Re: sa-learn segmentation fault and thereafter errors while learning
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 09:55:33AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Closing as INV
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3530
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-22 10:03 ---
Received: from mail (helo=afzhg1892.com)
by proton.pathname.com with local-smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1BCDmr-0006WP-00
for <[EMAIL PRO
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3524
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3532
Summary: Number of Spamd process grow without any control and
system stucked
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 2.63
Platform: HP
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3530
Summary: ALL_TRUSTED false positive
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
P
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3531
Summary: Spamd autolerning changes bayes database permissions
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 2.63
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Pri
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3530
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-22 02:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=2058)
--> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2058&action=view)
ok, so it's not exactly low scoring spam
--- You
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3524
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-22 04:01 ---
Removed the bayes databases and reran the learn, and guess what? No problem.
I guess it's not duplicatable. Please accept my apologies for wasting your
time.
The author of the paper, Gordon Cormack, has a lot of experience in the area
of information retrieval. It would be a good idea to carefully analyse his
results and conclusions for ways to improve SpamAssassin and for approaches
that we should ignore.
I've been very skeptical of the hand wavy appr
Hello,
I am testing SpamAssassin 3.0.0-pre1 for personal use on a system
with SpamAssassin 2.63 installed system wide. You guys seem to have
done a wonderfull job, and I see quite some new features in 3.0
that I like.
I got one problem though, which I assume is a bug, or I somehow
misconfigured s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://plg.uwaterloo.ca/~gvcormac/spamcormack.html
A good study comparing SpamAssassin (in several configurations) and
several other spam filtering systems, over the course of 8 months (Aug
2003 to Mar 2004). The measurements and methodology are al
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
To clarify: I'm +1 on moving to Jira, -1 on using the ASF BZ, and +1 on
using our own BZ, *if* that's OK with the ASF and Theo maintains it. ;)
- --j.
Theo Van Dinter writes:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 10:55:47AM +1200, Sidney Markowitz wrote:
> > On
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+0.9 on those proposed changes.
Only 1 change: I would suggest that legit bounce messages, where you (the
user) sends a ham (obviously ;) mail and it bounces, should be retained in
the ham corpus where they occur.
- --j.
Daniel Quinlan writes:
> I
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 10:55:47AM +1200, Sidney Markowitz wrote:
> On the other hand, if somebody at Apache is taking care of setting it
> all up and using it is as easy as what we are doing now with Bugzilla,
> it would not make that much difference.
Well, the ASF already has Jira setup, and i
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3529
Summary: MIME_BOUND_RKFINDY occurs in at least one legit tool
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 2.63
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Pri
I think we should consider some updates to the policy, especially
considering the copious amounts of spam we have, the recent explosion in
joe-job bounces, etc. Current policy below, but first, here are my
proposed changes:
1. firm age limits:
- no ham older than 12 months
- no spam older t
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3528
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- You
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3528
Summary: "Run network tests" should default to "yes" in
MakeFile.PL
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
38 matches
Mail list logo
