On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:14:18AM +, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> I'm not sure how Vipul is going to do this (I don't follow the Razor list
> since Razor is so unreliable that we don't use it). I spent a week
> investigating Nilsimsa, even wrote a perl module for it (which I may
> release if I get
I don't know if any of you folks have read bug 62:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62
but I have an idea that I'd like to sound out to see whether people
would be interested in (a) participating in, (b) if someone else is
doing something like this, and (c) if you can see any p
I finally managed to get perl working right on my fiancee's OSX machine, so now
I can try and help with the various BSD complaints and stuff.
C
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassas
Daniel Rogers wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:00:33PM -0800, Rob McMillin wrote:
>
>>Should be busted, but see bug 39; I believe another patch has been
>>accepted for this bug.
>>
>
>Isn't that LINE_OF_YELLING, not SUBJ_ALL_CAPS?
>
>Or did the patch affect both?
>
Ah, my bad -- you're right.
I missed a closing parenthesis. Trying again...
body WORK_AT_HOME /(?:WORK|MAKE (?:MONEY|\${1,})|WORKING)
(?:AT|FROM) HOME/i
describe WORK_AT_HOME Information on how to work at home
body HOME_EMPLOYMENT/(?:HOME EMPLOYMENT|HOME.?WORKER)/i
describe HOME_EMPLOYME
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:00:33PM -0800, Rob McMillin wrote:
> Should be busted, but see bug 39; I believe another patch has been
> accepted for this bug.
Isn't that LINE_OF_YELLING, not SUBJ_ALL_CAPS?
Or did the patch affect both?
Dan.
___
Spamass
Daniel Rogers wrote:
>I just noticed that SUBJ_ALL_CAPS matches on a blank subject. Is this
>intentional?
>
>Should it maybe be rewritten as:
>
>Subject =~ /^[^a-z]+$/ instead of Subject =~ /^[^a-z]*$/
>
>?
>
>(Would that even work?)
>
Should be busted, but see bug 39; I believe another patch ha
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Juan F. Codagnone wrote:
> I don't want spamassassin to modify (write any report) in the body of
> the mail (i want't only to add the headers). I searched for any option
> and i didn't find anything.
In your preferences, set:
report_header 1
use_terse_report 1
The use_terse
On Tuesday 05 March 2002 06:11 pm, Ricardo Kleemann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a message from a mailing list which spamassassin flags as spam,
> however it is not.
>
> How can I handle that?
If the mailing list puts its email address in the From header, put
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But "Automatic list" sounds dumb. And neither black nor white are colors,
so "automatic color list" is inaccurate. Maybe "Automatic brightness list"
or "ABL". Personally I like leaving it as AWL and just having it be an
inside joke.
C
On 3/5/02 6:05 PM, "Duncan Findlay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Kerry Nice wrote:
> Is Front Page ever used in non-spam.
Yes. Sad as it is...
> Would a check for some of these things be useful?
...but it probably would. :)
[...]
> Just out of curiousity, I looked quickly though my mail. 2002FebSpam
> has about 1000 messages in it,
On 3/5/02 4:25 PM, "Richard Sonnen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It might be useful to set up spamc and spamd so that you could
> specify alternate config files more easily. i.e.
>
> spamc --cf /path/to/system/conf/dir --rf /path/to/user/rules
>
> The flags (if present) would be passed on to s
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, dman wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 12:48:53PM -0800, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
[...]
>| Actually, iso-8859-1 is for English.
>
> It is for Western Europe. US-ASCII is a proper subset of all the ISO
> and UTF-8.
It's also worth noting that Microsoft products regularly announ
Try perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
C
On 3/5/02 3:41 PM, "Juan F. Codagnone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (cc me. i'm not in the list)
>
> I don't want spamassassin to modify (write any report) in the body of the
> mail (i want't only to add the headers). I searched for any option and i
> did
Hi,
I have a message from a mailing list which spamassassin flags as spam,
however it is not.
How can I handle that?
Ricardo
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
I was just thinking, perhaps we should change the name of the "automatic
whitelist." In my experience, it seems to be a pretty good blacklist too :-)
--
Duncan Findlay
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/
The current NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS didn't catch the last bit of doamin
registry spam I got.
body NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS /new\s*domain\s*extension/i
The word "Internet" was inserted between "new" and "domain", so the rule
wasn't triggered. This rule catches both variants:
body NEW_DOMAIN_EX
Hi,
What are you using as your backend? Straight qmail or vmailmgr or vpopmail?
qmail expects a seekable pipe from any program output so you may need
filepipe (www.nougen.com/test/filepipe.tgz) or the seekable patch to
vpopmail's vdeliver (www.gallowglass.com or something similar).
With vmailm
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 12:48:53PM -0800, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
| Matthew Cline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| > For those of you who find that English-centricity helps to filter spam,
| > here's a rule that looks for non-ASCII encoding in the subject line:
| >
| > header NON_ASCII_ENC_SUBJ
http://news.com.com/2100-1023-850761.html
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Dog is my co-pilot.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
On Tuesday 05 March 2002 07:23 am, Rob McMillin wrote:
> Already exists -- see CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADERS.
Ooops, didn't realize it did that. Guess I should read all of EvalTest.pm
before submitting new rules...
--
Visit http://dmoz.org, the world's | Give a man a match, and he'll be warm
lar
An off-list discussion of the SA config process brought up an
unrelated good idea that I'm passing along:
It might be useful to set up spamc and spamd so that you could
specify alternate config files more easily. i.e.
spamc --cf /path/to/system/conf/dir --rf /path/to/user/rules
The flags (if
It seems that part of the reason that the HUNZA_DIET_BREAD doesn't seem to
be doing anything is that they've changed their message around so the rule
doesn't match any more.
Here's part of the message that was received a couple weeks ago:
---
Hunza Bread
Home made Hunza Bread is a simple, delic
I just noticed that SUBJ_ALL_CAPS matches on a blank subject. Is this
intentional?
Should it maybe be rewritten as:
Subject =~ /^[^a-z]+$/ instead of Subject =~ /^[^a-z]*$/
?
(Would that even work?)
Dan.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL P
(cc me. i'm not in the list)
I don't want spamassassin to modify (write any report) in the body of the
mail (i want't only to add the headers). I searched for any option and i
didn't find anything.
I tried to use
clear-report-template
as report but i get
SPAM: (no report template found)
I com
I have it working kind of. I can actually filter the emails through
spamassassin ok using the .qmail file but spamassassin is not taging any
of the emails.
I have tried both |spamassassin -P and |spamc both pass the email back
to qmail but do not actually filter the email in any way. Any other
c
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 01:20:46PM -0800, Scott Doty wrote:
>
> I wasn't aware that nilsimsa required one to check against all the
> hashes in the database. I take it there's no way to index the hashes
> to speed up matches? (e.g., maybe only check hashes that have approximately
> the same numb
On 05 March 2002, Richard Sonnen said:
> I've got an idea for making the SpamAssassin configuration process
> more flexible, and I'd love to hear your suggestions and comments
> before I jump in and make a mess of the code ;-)
I'm in favour of making it more flexible, and I don't care about SQL
This relates to what's been discussed on the razor & dcc issue. I may
provide people in this list an idea of where Vipul's going since someone
mentioned that they weren't certain on the project status for razor.
-Original Message-
From: Vipul Ved Prakash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:17:09AM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-03-05 at 09:35, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Yevgeniy Miretskiy wrote:
> >
> > > The question is: why do I need to run all tests if I'm running spamassassin with
>-L flag?
>
> > > Again, sorry if this t
I've got an idea for making the SpamAssassin configuration process
more flexible, and I'd love to hear your suggestions and comments
before I jump in and make a mess of the code ;-)
I'm in the process of deploying SpamAssassin on a distributed mail
farm. The farm environment causes a number of
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:14:18AM +, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Scott Doty wrote:
> > One of our senior system administrators, Kelsey, has had contact with Vipul
> > -- I understand Vipul is working on incorporating "fuzzy" hashes into Razor
> > using the nilsimsa algorithm.
Matthew Cline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For those of you who find that English-centricity helps to filter spam,
> here's a rule that looks for non-ASCII encoding in the subject line:
>
> header NON_ASCII_ENC_SUBJ Subject =~ /=\?(?:euc-kr|big5|iso-8859-1)\?/
> describe NON_ASCII_ENC_SUBJ
Matthew Cline wrote:
>On Tuesday 05 March 2002 02:08 am, I wrote:
>
>>header NON_ASCII_ENC_SUBJ Subject =~
>>/=\?(?:euc-kr|big5|iso-8859-1)\?/
>>
>
>Actually:
>
>header NON_ASCII_ENC_SUBJ Subject =~ /=\?(?:euc-kr|big5|iso-8859-1)\?/i
>
>as it needs to be case insensitive.
>
Already ex
I agree it looks good -- adding it now:
rawbody FRONTPAGE /FrontPage.Editor/
describe FRONTPAGE FrontPage used to create message
score FRONTPAGE 2.00
I'll let the GA score it on the next run, but I see similar ratios in
the corpus at a glance.
C
On Tue, 2002-03-05 at 11:17, rODbegbie wrote:
>
Quoting Kerry Nice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Just out of curiousity, I looked quickly though my
> mail.2002FebSpam has about 1000 messages in it, it
> tagged like 6% of them. In the rest of my email,
> which covers a number of years, out of those 8 extra,
> 5 of them were webpages I mailed to m
On Tue, 2002-03-05 at 09:35, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Yevgeniy Miretskiy wrote:
>
> > The question is: why do I need to run all tests if I'm running spamassassin with
>-L flag?
> > Again, sorry if this topic was beaten to death before...
> The problem is that some of the scor
Is Front Page ever used in non-spam. Would a check
for some of these things be useful? At least as the
beginning of a message, possibly somebody might send
an attached page with some of this stuff in it.
UUnleaded Gasoline
Just out of curiousity, I looked quickly though my
mail.2002Feb
Great! Then I can use the script I got from SpamCop
(http://spamcop.net/reporter.pl).
Don
- Original Message -
From: "Craig Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Donald Greer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "spamassassin-talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 7:57 PM
Subject: Re:
> I'd agree with this. Maybe a body/subject test? One that I've seen
> recently was mentioning Viagra in the subject, but only talking about their
> 'online pharmacy' in the body.
This seems a bit off to me - shouldn't they be separate tests? It seems like
"viagra" in the subject should be wort
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 01:28:20AM -0800, Matthew Cline wrote:
> There's some body tests that would also work for the subject, like the
> CASHCASHCASH test, and I've seen some spam were the tests didn't match the
> body but would have matched the subject. Would it be worth it to make a
> body_
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Yevgeniy Miretskiy wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I'm new to the list so please excuse me if this topic was beaten to death...
>
> I'm very impressed with spam assassin acuracy in spam detection, however
> it is not as fast as I wish it was (which is very much understandable gi
Hello everybody,
I'm new to the list so please excuse me if this topic was beaten to death...
I'm very impressed with spam assassin acuracy in spam detection, however
it is not as fast as I wish it was (which is very much understandable given
that spamassassin is written in perl and uses huge nu
People should be allowed to not-read or not-receive any or all of their
email. Period. It doesn't matter whether it's because they are
xenophobic morons, or because they don't know anyone outside the US -- It
doesn't matter because it's their mail and their spool.
On Sat, 2 Mar 2002, Rob McMil
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 02:08:39AM -0800, Matthew Cline wrote:
| For those of you who find that English-centricity helps to filter spam,
| here's a rule that looks for non-ASCII encoding in the subject line:
|
| header NON_ASCII_ENC_SUBJ Subject =~ /=\?(?:euc-kr|big5|iso-8859-1)\?/
| descr
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:37:37AM +, Christof Damian wrote:
| On Tue, 05 Mar 2002, dman wrote:
| > Subject: test message
| >
| > hi
| > .
| > 250 OK id=16i79G-0005YP-00
| >
| >
| > When this arrived, it was hit by RAZOR_CHECK. Can anyone offer an
| > explantion for why this message would
> -Original Message-
> From: Olivier Nicole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 05 March 2002 01:51
> To: Tony Hoyle
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] How to use check_whitelist?
>
>
> Tony,
>
> There are 3 or 4 versions of DB out in the wild, some quite
On Tuesday 05 March 2002 02:08 am, I wrote:
> header NON_ASCII_ENC_SUBJ Subject =~
> /=\?(?:euc-kr|big5|iso-8859-1)\?/
Actually:
header NON_ASCII_ENC_SUBJ Subject =~ /=\?(?:euc-kr|big5|iso-8859-1)\?/i
as it needs to be case insensitive.
--
Visit http://dmoz.org, the world's | G
For those of you who find that English-centricity helps to filter spam,
here's a rule that looks for non-ASCII encoding in the subject line:
header NON_ASCII_ENC_SUBJ Subject =~ /=\?(?:euc-kr|big5|iso-8859-1)\?/
describe NON_ASCII_ENC_SUBJ Non-ASCII encoded subject
It just does EUC Ko
On Tue, 05 Mar 2002, dman wrote:
> Subject: test message
>
> hi
> .
> 250 OK id=16i79G-0005YP-00
>
>
> When this arrived, it was hit by RAZOR_CHECK. Can anyone offer an
> explantion for why this message would be in razor's database?
probably someone else used it for testing razor. other small
There's some body tests that would also work for the subject, like the
CASHCASHCASH test, and I've seen some spam were the tests didn't match the
body but would have matched the subject. Would it be worth it to make a
body_subject test which would add the subject to the body before running the
For whatever reason I'm now getting Brasilian spam...
Looks to me as though the last paragraph - I assume its quoting some
spam friendly statute - could have some good things to match on.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
[ Phone: +44 1423 85
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Scott Doty wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 02:29:14PM -0500, Rose, Bobby wrote:
> > I've perused the razor list archives and my take is that they will
> > release the server daemon once they deal with the trust issues. They
> > don't want to have spammers setup a server and
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Greg Ward wrote:
> On 04 March 2002, Matt Sergeant said:
> > "Dear matt"
>
> But your local part is "msergeant", I just checked! How much real mail
> do you get that says "Dear msergeant"?
That's work email (where I don't care about spam that much) - home is
matt @ sergeant.
54 matches
Mail list logo
