At 07/02/2002 21:24, Kenneth Porter wrote:
>In /etc/procmailrc I have:
>
>:0fw
>| /usr/bin/spamc -u spamd
>
>Before adding the -u to spamc, no processing appeared to happen, and log
>
>What's the right way to get per-user configs in this setup?
I believe you can fix this by addding
DROPPR
I'm running spamc/spamd on Red Hat 7.2 from the 2.20 RPM. (Just finished
building 2.31 and will update shortly.)
The spamd command line, taken from the initscript, looks like this:
spamd -d -c -a
In /etc/procmailrc I have:
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamc -u spamd
Before adding the -u to spamc, no proce
Dear SpamAssassin Talk,
I think my domain/IP might be on one of the blacklists - my mailserver has
definitely been attacked - but I can't seem to find out who to contact to
findout and ask forgiveness...
...anyways, so after trying to stop SPAM at the server level by other
means, I'm now inst
Hi Bob,
> I run spamd as follows:
> /usr/bin/spamd -d -u nobody
And how do you run spamc?
> (1) Whether the user_prefs settings are used or not seems to be
> hit-and-miss. What's in the header often disagrees with waht actually
> happens. For example:
I beleinve the difference is because w
Thanks, that did the trick ... now I just need to get it working :)
I've made procmail my local delivery agent in sendmail.cf so I know it's
gong through procmail. But I don't see a X-Spam-Status in the header,
alsmost like my .procmailrc is being ignored in it's call to spamassassin.
thanks agai
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 08:48:25PM -0400, Mark wrote:
| Hi all,
|
| I'm trying to build Spamassassin 2.31 on my HPUX 11.00 systems. I'm using
| gcc 3.02 and gnu make 3.79.1
| When I do a 'make' I get the following error:
|
| gcc -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199506L -D_HPUX_SOURCE -I/usr/local/include -D_LA
>don't own. According to the SPEWS event ticket its just a single server there
>which had sent Spam (with 4 IPs on it according to NMAP) and SPEWS blocks
>+60K IP addresses thanks to that fact. There is absolutely no way to get out
>of SPEWS until the owner of the netblock shuts down the spamme
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 02 July 2002 06:53 pm, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 05:40:25PM -0600, Mike Diehl wrote:
> | On Tuesday 02 July 2002 08:10 am, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> | > On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 09:52:01A
Hi all,
I'm trying to build Spamassassin 2.31 on my HPUX 11.00 systems. I'm using
gcc 3.02 and gnu make 3.79.1
When I do a 'make' I get the following error:
gcc -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199506L -D_HPUX_SOURCE -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFI
LE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Ae -O spamd/spamc.c \
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 05:40:25PM -0600, Mike Diehl wrote:
| On Tuesday 02 July 2002 08:10 am, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
| > On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 09:52:01AM +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote:
[snip]
| > | Personally I think you're wasting your bandwidth.
| >
| > Actually, it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 02 July 2002 08:10 am, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 09:52:01AM +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> | Meino Christian Cramer wrote:
> | > is it possible (and how) to configure spamd/sa-exim that way, that
[how come I didn't get the original message? oh well]
| On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 10:40:30AM -0500, McClung, Darren W. wrote:
| > I know Linux reasonably well,
That's good. So do I.
| > but I'm fairly ignorant when it comes to sendmail.
Same here. My solution is to not use sendmail :-). Here'
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 11:05:25PM +0200, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
| Whaddaya'all think... is stupid-vacation-program-nuking of an
| urgent nature?
Yes. I get enough mail already (spam and otherwise). I don't need
any brain-dead vacation notices from people I don't know and have
never spoken
> I will be out of the office starting 07/02/2002 and will not return until
> 07/08/2002.
>
> I will respond to your message when I return. If you need anything that
> is of an urgent nature, please contact Leslie Branch x 2826 or Carl
> Carpenter at x 2343.
Ok guys, should I call her and ask
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002 the voices made [EMAIL PROTECTED] write:
> I will be out of the office starting 07/02/2002 and will not return until
> 07/08/2002.
>
> I will respond to your message when I return. If you need anything that
> is of an urgent nature, please contact Leslie Branch x 2826 or Car
OK, I fixed things, but I'm not really sure what was wrong to begin
with, but it was clearly a razor problem. Short story, I placed IP
addresses from a known-working razor install .razor.lst into place on
the busted razor and everything works now. Rerun make test and
everything is OK.
On Tue, 2
I will be out of the office starting 07/02/2002 and will not return until
07/08/2002.
I will respond to your message when I return. If you need anything that
is of an urgent nature, please contact Leslie Branch x 2826 or Carl
Carpenter at x 2343.
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 10:40:30AM -0500, McClung, Darren W. wrote:
> Currently I have sendmail-8.12.4 built and functional on the
> firewall, but I can't get it to both forward mail and send it through
> spamassassin. I've tried building spamass-milter, but the make always fails
> with "libmilte
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> > I had a similar problem, and after going through the documentation I
> > noticed that the problem was that I had forgotten to add the following to
> > the beginning of the procmailrc file:
> >
> > DROPPRIVS=yes
>
> I appreciate all your help, but al
On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 10:40, McClung, Darren W. wrote:
> I know Linux reasonably well, but I'm fairly ignorant when it comes to
> sendmail. Here is what I am trying to accomplish. I have a Linux firewall
> that acts as a packet filter between the outside world and an internal
> subnet on a priva
> -Original Message-
> From: McClung, Darren W. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 02 July 2002 16:41
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin with Exchange
>
>
> I know Linux reasonably well, but I'm fairly ignorant when it comes to
> sendmail. Here is what I am trying
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 10:40:30AM -0500, McClung, Darren W. wrote:
> I know Linux reasonably well, but I'm fairly ignorant when it comes to
> sendmail. Here is what I am trying to accomplish. I have a Linux firewall
> that acts as a packet filter between the outside world and an internal
> subn
> I know people have accomplished this previously. Is there a general
> consensus as to what is the best way to configure such a setup?
>
>
Install qmail with QMAILQUEUE patch, qmail-scanner, and spamassassin.
Add smtproutes to forward mail from your domain into your internal mail server. My
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 09:52:01AM +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Meino Christian Cramer wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> > is it possible (and how) to configure spamd/sa-exim that way, that
> > the spammer gets a return code, which says, that my email address is
> > permanently not reachable (was it return cod
> > Being heavy-handed isn't the same thing as being Nazi-ish. No matter how
> > heavy handed they might be, the real-world equivalent of black-lists are
> > boycotts, not Fascists and dictators.
>
> Nothing against heavy handed measures against Spammers, but hey .. being
> counted off as accep
I know Linux reasonably well, but I'm fairly ignorant when it comes to
sendmail. Here is what I am trying to accomplish. I have a Linux firewall
that acts as a packet filter between the outside world and an internal
subnet on a private IP address range. What I would like to accomplish is to
hav
I finally grabbed 2.31 (since it looked from the list like it had
settled down), and I'm having some problems. From what I can tell
it's either something wrong with Razor (I'm using v1.20) or the Dns.pm
in SpamAssassin. Just to lay down some basics, this is a RH 7.2
system where I'm making from
I didn't get much of a response to this the first time. Will try again.
I'm told that 2.40 is out...would upgrading solve any of this?
Hey all -
I'm running 2.30 under RedHat 7.2 (with security updates) and 2.4.9
(custom-compiled). I have the RBL and Vipul's Razor options enabled,
otherw
**Sorry about that... Outlook merged lines together...**
I have read tons of emails on how to do this and wanted to do it myself. So
I came up with an easy solution edit qmail-scanner-queue.pl :)
Just insert the following code into the Spamassassin subroutine.
START HERE ##
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Is anyone else *not* having this problem? I've been running 3.21 and
> 3.22 for ages now, and have seen none of the corrupt message problems
> that everyone else seems to be having.
I've never had them either, actually. That's why I keep pointing pe
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Is anyone else *not* having this problem? I've been running 3.21 and
> 3.22 for ages now, and have seen none of the corrupt message problems
> that everyone else seems to be having.
Haven't seen the problem yet. NetBSD 1.5.2 and procmail-3.22 from
pkgsrc/mail/procmail,
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 09:12:20AM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> Are you using an mbox message store? It seems like it is the mbox
> From_ separator that gets corrupted. I hypothesize that if you are
> using maildir instead that you won't be tickling that bug.
Standard mbox format. Not
I have read tons of emails on how to do this and wanted to do it myself. So
I came up with an easy solution edit qmail-scanner-queue.pl :)
Just insert the following code into the Spamassassin subroutine.
START HERE ###
if ($sa_status == 1) { # Did spamc say
Thanks for the several responses! It works great now!
Harold
"Tony L. Svanstrom" wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 the voices made Harold Hallikainen write:
>
> > |IFS=' ' && exec /usr/bin/procmail -f- || exit 75 #harold
>
> Try something like this, _with_ the quotemarks (too tired to remember what
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 09:44:09AM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
| On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 05:28:52PM -0600, Mike Diehl wrote:
| > Yup, this fixed it. I also left myself a note to get the latest
| > procmail. I just don't have time right now.
| >
| > I used to use procmail about 5 years ago and
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 09:52:01AM +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote:
| Meino Christian Cramer wrote:
| >
| > is it possible (and how) to configure spamd/sa-exim that way, that
| > the spammer gets a return code, which says, that my email address is
| > permanently not reachable (was it return code 550 ?
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 10:50:09AM +0300, Osma Ahvenlampi wrote:
> decided to update the installation to version 2.31. Thanks to the
> well-built spec file, that turned out to be exceedingly simple!
Thanks. :) As an FYI, I've had some RPMs available since 2.31's release
(mentioned on the SA-tal
I've tried just about everything I can think of.
I've tried adding and subtracting lines of -
rewrite_subject (with a 1 *or* a 0)
as well as -
subject_tag (by itself, and with *SPAM*)
but nothing seems ot make the subject line be rewriten.
I've done this to both the local.cf and the
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 05:28:52PM -0600, Mike Diehl wrote:
> Yup, this fixed it. I also left myself a note to get the latest procmail. I
> just don't have time right now.
>
> I used to use procmail about 5 years ago and didn't have this problem, though.
Is anyone else *not* having this probl
On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 06:27:01PM +0200, Meino Christian Cramer wrote:
> One think I hadn't find out until now is how I can make
> this combo make _bouncing_ spam instead of sending back
> and explanation, why and who has detected a certain mail
> as spam.
My code for exim does that, see SAp
On Monday 01 July 2002 10:02 pm, Matthew Cline spake:
>
> You can try to figure out which porn phrases aren't being picked up by SA,
> then add them to your ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs file like so:
>
> body MYPORN_1 /porn phrase/
> scoreMYPORN_1 2.0
> describe MYPORN_1 "porn phrase"
>
> If
> I had a similar problem, and after going through the documentation I
> noticed that the problem was that I had forgotten to add the following to
> the beginning of the procmailrc file:
>
> DROPPRIVS=yes
I appreciate all your help, but all of that is done. As I said, a lot of the
DB is working
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002 the voices made Michael Stauber write:
> I have a Spamassassing PKG ready for the RaQ3 and RaQ4 - complete with config
> pages for admin and end-user that tie into the Cobalt GUI.
Sounds great, where I can find those; and can I just install them on top of
the CPAN-installed S
> Do you really think they'll care? These spammers send out 80+ million
> emails at a time, and they fully expect to get lots of bounces back, and
> ignore them.
>
> Personally I think you're wasting your bandwidth.
I agree - on Friday I converted a few old addresses to spamtraps. All of
them had
Meino Christian Cramer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is it possible (and how) to configure spamd/sa-exim that way, that
> the spammer gets a return code, which says, that my email address is
> permanently not reachable (was it return code 550 ??? I am not
> sure...)
Do you really think they'll care? Thes
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 the voices made Harold Hallikainen write:
> |IFS=' ' && exec /usr/bin/procmail -f- || exit 75 #harold
Try something like this, _with_ the quotemarks (too tired to remember what
they're called or look them up in the dictionary; woke up because of a
phonecall :-( ).
"|IFS=' '
> So, reviewing the README file with SpamAssassin, I put the following in my
>.forward:
>
> |IFS=' ' && exec /usr/bin/procmail -f- || exit 75 #harold
You're missing the double-quotes. Put those in the file and you
should be fine. They were not quoting text to put in the file. Those
quote
47 matches
Mail list logo
