..which is exactly what is run if you read on the footer of my URL :-)
Mailgraph uses rrdtool.
- Niclas
At 08:53 2002-11-08, you wrote:
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 08:26:36AM +0100, Maillists for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very nice graph!
May I make a suggestion? We hade migrated to rrdtool
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 10:44:53PM +0200, Jan Korger wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I installed SA on Debian woody to filter my POP3 email. Therefore
fetchmail is used, forwarding fetched mail to localhost:smtp. Thus, exim
will be run through inetd. Exim will then
Paul Fries said the following on 07/11/02 18:34:
Ahh now it all makes sense. :) Thanks Matt.
Hopefully we will see this feature again. It is a great idea.
So I assume that SA3 will be running all of its negative rules first
then?
One of the plans for SA3 is to have pluggable rule runners. The
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 03:49:12PM -0200, sandra wrote:
Hello ALL,
Hi,
I would like to understand how to use sa_learn_spam... or
auto_learn...
sa-learn-[non]spam is to train the bayesian filter in the cvs version of
spamassassin. You have to feed them with 200 mails each and then
I've come across a pretty serious problem, but I'm not sure if SA or
qmail-scanner is to blame. The problem is that messages (incorrectly) tagged
as spam gets their MIME headers broken somehow. The end result is that the
MIME stuff as well as the encoded attachments show up as readable text in
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 02:52:08PM +0100, Andreas Lund wrote:
I've come across a pretty serious problem, but I'm not sure if SA or
qmail-scanner is to blame. The problem is that messages (incorrectly) tagged
as spam gets their MIME headers broken somehow. The end result is that the
MIME stuff
I've come across a pretty serious problem, but I'm not sure if SA or
qmail-scanner is to blame. The problem is that messages
(incorrectly) tagged
as spam gets their MIME headers broken somehow. The end
result is that the
MIME stuff as well as the encoded attachments show up as
readable
Hi,
Im really newbie with SpamAssassin, so if this is known configuration
problem, just please tell me where to find documentation.
Im running SA on FreeBSD box, with Anomy sanitizer and Postfix.
SpamAssassin is installed from ports-tree, and running spamd.
Postfix sends mails to filtering
defang_mime 0 in your config file.
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Lund [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 07:52
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Broken MIME in tagged messages
I've come across a pretty serious problem, but I'm not sure if SA or
We were succesfully using spamd until 2 days ago. At that time the server on
which it was running was brought down abruptly due to a small fire in the
computer room. That caused a bad block to appear on disk and several files
(including perl modules) to disappear. I have restored or rebuilt
Hi
I have put
blacklist_from *hotmail.com
in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
yet mail from hotmail.com isnt marked as spam? how can this be?
Thomas
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm
Tungsten T handheld. Power
On Thursday 07 November 2002 23:43, Jan Schreckenbach wrote:
Robin,
I don't believe getting 300 messages at once is a big problem.
On my router (P5 90Mhz) fetchmail downloads all messages at once
from my ISP and directly deliver it to my mail server (dual PII 350MHz).
There I have exim
Can you provide an example of an e-mail that got through, with all the
headers?
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
| Thomas Nyman
| Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 8:09 AM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: [SAtalk] local.cf doesnt seem
This is a totaly stupid question, but...
Did you restart spamd after you made the local.cf changes?
How do I know this is a stupid question? Guess. :-)
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Nyman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 8:08 AM
Subject:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've been a happy and silent user of SA for a while now. Running 2.30 now
for a whild I recently got a wild hair and decided to spend the ten
minutes needed to upgrade to 2.43. I'm just using SA as a user with
procmail, so the readme seemed cool to
Using this setup you will not need to make any modifications to the
qmail package, you will not need to update your current version of qmail
to the patched one, and you will not need to install qmail-scanner
either.
The only parts of spamassassin i use are spamd and spamc. spamassassin
daemon
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 03:05:25PM -0500, Drew Dowling wrote:
I've been a happy and silent user of SA for a while now. Running 2.30 now
for a whild I recently got a wild hair and decided to spend the ten
minutes needed to upgrade to 2.43. I'm just using SA as a user with
procmail, so the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Today it noticed a high percentage of (what I considered) false
negatives and very few postives. Checking mail headers I found out that
most of the messages had no SA markup at all, i.e. was very probably never
processed with SA. To make it short,
Finally found the right setting to ensure Razor2 works when using
MIME-Defang. Special thanks to Mark Velasquez.
A quick recap first:
RedHat 8
Sendmail 8.12.5
SA 2.43
MIMEDefang 2.24
Razor 2.20
Razor would appear in the report when running
spamassassin -t sample-spam.txt
but not when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well, I don't think this debug info is from SA (I've never seen this info
before). Personally, I would run spamassassin with a -D. I'm going to
guess the debug info is from DCC, Pyzor, or Razor (although it doesn't
look like that either). The
I confess, I am new.
I read through, not thoroughly, but through the perldoc pages for
the Mail::SpamAssassin module.
Where do I find more on such things as:
Razor
Bayesian_Filter
MIME
I'm interested in playing with plugging more perl based modules
around Mail::SpamAssassin to build a better
Hi,
I'm currently running SpamAssassin 2.43 + Razor 2.20 + Postfix 1.1.11 and
having some issues regarding base64 encoded mail. SA doesn't seem to be
handling this mail properly as it is leaving the message body in an encoded
format. Any ideas? I have included a sample message at the
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 03:17:41PM -0500, Mike Griffin wrote:
cd into defaultdelivery and edit the rc file:
# Using spamassassin to check emails before
# Using qmail-local to deliver messages to ~/Maildir/ by default.
|spamc -c -f(the first character is a `pipe`)
./Maildir/
[...]
I use
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 06:54:20PM -0600, Jon Gabrielson wrote:
Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyways, This would probably be a good
blacklist address to add because I can't
imagine it ever being a valid reply address.
opt-out maybe, but not opt-in
FYI: In 2.50, there's a rule that catches
Andreas Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-11-08 14:52:08 +0100]:
I've come across a pretty serious problem, but I'm not sure if SA or
qmail-scanner is to blame. The problem is that messages (incorrectly) tagged
as spam gets their MIME headers broken somehow. The end result is that the
MIME stuff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-11-08 16:56:06 -0800]:
I'm currently running SpamAssassin 2.43 + Razor 2.20 + Postfix 1.1.11 and
having some issues regarding base64 encoded mail. SA doesn't seem to be
handling this mail properly as it is leaving the message body in an encoded
I am using SpamAss through C-panel, which has only 2 options - enable and
disable. I have 2 issues I am hoping someone can help with.
1. There appears to be a bug where some NON-spam emails are split into
multiple emails! The latter half of the email appears as a separate email
with no date,
27 matches
Mail list logo
