Re: [SAtalk] AWL

2003-01-21 Thread Matt Kettler
Ok, USER_IN_WHITELIST has nothing to do with the AWL, but yes, it does look at Sender: Snipping from EvalTests.pm's subroutine all_from_addrs, which is used in check_from_in_whitelist: return $self-{main}-find_all_addrs_in_line ($self-get ('From') . # std

Re: [SAtalk] Spam-Report for non-spam

2003-01-21 Thread Justin Mason
Roman Katzer said: On Monday, January 20, 2003, 21:36:07, you wrote: It is pretty trivial, but I wondered if anyone else has yet found that helpful and should it be a suggestion for an enhancement - maybe report_header_nonspam 1 or something?? Count me in! What did you change? I

[SAtalk] spamd and spamassassin consume all available RAM until system terminates them

2003-01-21 Thread Joey Smith
Hi. I'm on a debian Linux machine, running sarge/testing. Whenever I try to start spamd or spamassassin, they consume all available memory until they're killed by the system. Just for kicks, I added 5 GB of swap space. That's right, 5 Gigabytes. Then I started spamd again. It used up all 5GB

[SAtalk] Very, very, very slow performance on RH 8.0

2003-01-21 Thread Mark Thorp Duxbury
Greetings, First let me apologize if this has been covered before but for the last several days I have been unable to search the arcchives for this list (the search allways times out). That said...I've been using spamassassin (currently 2.31) for a long time now on an old PII-266 under a

Re: [SAtalk] [PATCH] Add always_report Configuration Option

2003-01-21 Thread Justin Mason
sabat said: This is a patch I always find myself making whenever I install SA on our servers. It's useful to always have the spam report included in the headers, even if a mail is not tagged as spam -- we often want to know what rules the mail triggered, and maybe why it didn't get