Re: [SAtalk] False positive in RCVD_IN_RFCI test

2003-02-10 Thread Tony L. Svanstrom
BA On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 11:24:51 - Kevin Anthoney BA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BA Apologies for top posting, BTW. I'm at work, hence $£@@@#!! Outlook. URL: http://www.flash.to/oe-quotefix/ -- /\___/\ /\___/\ \_@ @_/

[SAtalk] rewriting other headers (for stupid MUAs)

2003-02-10 Thread Alex Perry
1.8. How can I change the way SpamAssassin marks up messages it considers to be spam? I'd love to be able to downgrade the priority of a message by spam level. It could be a lookup table, or simply a linear relationship as below. Is there an easy way to implement that into SA ? limit = 3 -

[SAtalk] key words to add

2003-02-10 Thread Kathryn Cramer
Adding in-cest to the key words used to filter would have stopped this one, as would luving. Kathryn Cramer -- Forwarded message -- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2003 07:23:09 -0300 From: Lana Victorio [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fwd: Luving Parents doing Attractive

Re: [SAtalk] RBL problems

2003-02-10 Thread Matt Kettler
You are correct, there's no reason to force it to yes unless you know for sure your DNS server is nearly 100% available. If you have it forced to yes and DNS becomes unavailable it's going to time out and assume no listing. The problem is that it's going to have to time out each and every RBL