Thanks for detailed description.
What if spammers start to send spam using @paypal.com from addresses?
On Среда, 26 Февраль 2003 21:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This sender (paypal) is built-in in the default SA rules. It is supposed
> to never send
> spam to you. And the actual message you rec
> there is a newer version that the one posted in the link below
>
> i am currently running 0.6.2 and it works great
>
> you would have to email
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get the newest version...
>
D'oh.. he's been making new versions and not telling us all? ;)
--
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Rob Mangiafico wrote:
> How is everyone finding the effectiveness of 2.50 vs. 2.43/4 without the
> use of a tweaked Bayes filter? Better? Worse? The same?
I've had one false positive (caused by new non-Bayes rules, and not
salvaged by Bayes training) and two false negatives,
At 10:53 AM 02/26/2003, you wrote:
I was bored and decided to browse the spamtrap, and found:
"This is not spam, because we are giving you an opportunity to remove
yourself from out database. We have received your email address through a
system that harvests e-mails from the Internet to which we h
On 02/26/03 04:06 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] sat at the `puter and typed:
>
>This sender (paypal) is built-in in the default SA rules. It is
>supposed to never send spam to you. And the actual message you
>received was not spam as such. Somehow something went wrong in
>the mail send an
