Re: [SAtalk] Any ideas????

On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Jeff Funk wrote: The header below is from an e-mail that seems to get through sa repeatedly on our Communigate server. There's no evidence that it's being scanned by sa at all. Is there something I'm missing here Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0

Re: [SAtalk] Webmail system incorporating sa-learn

On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 08:54:09PM -0700, Jefferson Cowart wrote: Sorry if this question has already been answered, but I am unable to find an answer. In any case is there a webmail system that incorporates sa-learn functionality? I.e. a system that has a button that I can click to say this is

RE: [SAtalk] Any ideas????

about I have lots of ideas about lots of things. :o) Whats up? Ciao Tom -Original Message- From: Jeff Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 September 2003 07:48 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Any ideas Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from

Re: [SAtalk] Increasing memory with SA 2.55 problem

Jason Brunette wrote: Problem is timelog() in Mail::SpamAssassin. Thank you for the expalination. spamd doesn't have this problem because the timelog log entries are stored in a forked spamd process which dies after a message is scanned. The problem occurs if you use a modified version of

[SAtalk] does it work with solaries7?

Dear All , Kindly note that am new to spammassassin .. I have Sun Solaries 7 , sparc4 , mail server machine with sendmail 8.9.3 ... i have many problems with Spam emails . I need to know and make sure before i start , does spammassassin work with , solaries7 , sparc4 server and sendmail 8.9.3

[SAtalk] a question

Dear All , Kindly note tham am new to spammassassin , and i have sun solaries 7 , sparc4 , server . with sendmail 8.9.3 ... can i install Spamassassin or not ???!! Thanks , Muhannad _ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan

[SAtalk] how do I ask the list a question about

the male organ waker upper drug? If I use the V word i'm blocked. How are you doing this black listed regular expression thing to block any and all ocurrances of the V word? Original Message Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 08:54:51 -0600

[SAtalk] Razor install

Hi all, **Exuse me for this newbie quetsion , but I did not find anywhere the answer to my question** 1-Could anyone explain me why, in Razor installation , when running razor-admin create it is useful to change user name from root. What does it imply if user is still root? 2-Which percentage

RE: [SAtalk] unblacklist_from not working

How Xenophobic!! -Original Message- From: HighTechGlass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 September 2003 07:05 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] unblacklist_from not working I wanted to block all foreign domains, since all of it is spam, and SAProxy missed some of it. # Block

Re: [SAtalk] does it work with solaries7?

On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 09:38:53AM +, Muhannad Tamemi wrote: I need to know and make sure before i start , does spammassassin work with , solaries7 , sparc4 server and sendmail 8.9.3 ??? Get yourself a recent Perl (5.6.x) from sunfreeware.com, and a recent sendmail (8.12.10) with MILTER

[SAtalk] how do I test for viagro in the subject

line, in addition to the current tests performed on the body only? --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list

RE: [SAtalk] Any ideas????

Thanks Dave, I guess I didn't think about looking in the RBL list. I rememeber seeing somewhere a long list of blacklisted servers that someone was maintaining also, but I can't seem to find it again. Was that here and does anyone know where it is??? Thanks again, J. -Original

RE: [SAtalk] Recognising dynamic rr.com IPs

Here is a rule I love! It is one of the few I score aggressivly. I'm well aware of some of the FPs, but I counter with some nice Whitelists and negative rules. The rule is likely broken up by your mail browser. IT should be 3 lines long ;) header MY_DSL Received =~

RE: [SAtalk] Any ideas????

I believe it was too big for SA to scan. But if it did, there are some spam signs below. -Original Message- From: Jeff Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 1:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Any ideas Microsoft Mail Internet Headers

RE: [SAtalk] Ratware header vomit?

-Original Message- From: David B Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 6:30 PM To: Chris Santerre Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Ratware header vomit? *snip* X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8.5 required=5.0

[SAtalk] disable rbls, but keep pyzor, dcc, razor

Hi all, I keep getting numerous FPs from not-so-savvy people who have DSL/Cable (ie their machine is usually in some kind of DSL/Cable DHCP pool RBL, though their ISP mail server isn't), use predominantly HTML mail with big colors and weird fonts (i.e. hit HTML_* rules), hit FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,

RE: [SAtalk] writing a filter for masked word

See wiki www.exit0.us -Original Message- From: Robin Witkop-Staub [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 10:03 PM To: Spamassassin List Subject: [SAtalk] writing a filter for masked word How would be the syntax in a filter in the subject line to look

RE: [SAtalk] Questions for a newbie

I'll give this a stab. -Original Message- From: Steve Frazier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 10:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Questions for a newbie I have read the FAQ and I have some questions. I just joined the list and appreciate

RE: [SAtalk] disable rbls, but keep pyzor, dcc, razor

skip_rbl_checks 1 #even though they're default if installed anyway... use_razor2 1 use_pyzor 1 use_dcc 1 You've disabled the Osirusoft tests, I hope. Those hit everything on the Internet. -tom -Original Message- From: Covington, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday,

Re: [SAtalk] how do I ask the list a question about

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 18 Sep 2003 04:32:28 -0600: How are you doing this black listed regular expression thing to block any and all ocurrances of the V word? This is done by Sourceforge, not by the list. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet

Re: [SAtalk] disable rbls, but keep pyzor, dcc, razor

Covington, Chris wrote: Hi all, I keep getting numerous FPs from not-so-savvy people who have DSL/Cable (ie their machine is usually in some kind of DSL/Cable DHCP pool RBL, though their ISP mail server isn't), use predominantly HTML mail with big colors and weird fonts (i.e. hit HTML_* rules),

R: [SAtalk] Strange problem with SA 2.55

Hi I do not know your configuration. And my crystal ball is currently in repair. :) Sorry, ... I forget my configuration: required_hits 7.6 rewrite_subject 0 always_add_headers 1 always_add_report 1 report_safe 1 use_terse_report 1 use_bayes 1 auto_learn 1 skip_rbl_checks 1 use_razor2 1

[SAtalk] RE: Trying to add my own custom test...

In my original post I'd asked if there was a way to whitelist or something - maybe consider this test authoritative if it succeeds - cut down on the effort - 80% of my mail is inter-client, about 20% outside - which is where all the spam comes from of course... so I've added an X-header that I can

Re: [SAtalk] [SAdev] SpamAssassin 2.60 rc5 released

On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 16:46, Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 10:12:46PM +0100, Brian Morrison wrote: Built this from .spec file, updated the rpms, identifies as 2.60-rc4 AFAICS. Slip up,or maybe I'm still running rc4 and the rpm -U failed? To build the RPM from these rc

Re: [SAtalk] FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK from a mac

Thanks Tony and Martin. I've added the email headers as comment# 27 to bug#1970 On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 00:29, Tony Finch wrote: On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Martin Radford wrote: Your best bet is to open a bug at http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/ and attach a sample message (at a minimum the

Re: [SAtalk] Questions for a newbie

Steve Frazier wrote: I installed RH 9.0. It has Spamassassin installed along with sendmail. There has been talk about procmail, does that mean Spamassassin doesn't work with sendmail? sendmail on its own does not really know how to talk to SpamAssassin. If you were inclined to experiment,

[SAtalk] reporting problem

Suddenly today I have begun to get the following error when I try to report (SpamAssassin 2.60-rc4) SpamAssassin: no Internet hashing methods available, so couldn't report. Warning, unable to report spam For more information, re-run with -D option to see debug output. Running spamassassin -r -D

[SAtalk] Spam slipped through, why no Bayes?

2 questions: 1) why is SA not using my custom rule in my ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs file? 2) Why was Bayes not run on this message? Information: The ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs contains: bayes_ignore_header X-PerlMx-Spam header LOCAL_PERLMX_TAG_90 /X-PerlMX=~ /\b Probability=9[0-9]\%/ score

[SAtalk] Grrr...Bayes db corrupted again!

The last time this happened, the only way I could get sa-learn to start working again was to remove _journal, _msgcount, _seen and _toks, which presumably wipes out all existing bayes data. Is there a better way? Cannot open bayes_path /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/ R/W: Inappropriate file

Re: [SAtalk] Spam slipped through, why no Bayes?

1. Did you enable rules in user prefs in the system sa config? The default settings don't allow rules to be defined in user prefs (See man Perl::SpamAssassin::Conf). 2. The Bayes rules that score 0 (most of the mid-range of Bayes checks) don't show up in the report, but that doesn't mean Bayes

RE: [SAtalk] Spam slipped through, why no Bayes?

So what does the average person set for the threshold of largest message scanned by SA. Right now I'm at 32768 bytes. How large is it safe to go??? Jeffrey J Funk Chief Technology Officer Farin Associates, Inc. 608.661.4240 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[SAtalk] Auto Learn Question

I am using SA 2.55 on a mail server for only a few select users. We have auto_learn turned on for those users using procmail (I am not running the daemon). .procmailrc ###:0fw| /usr/bin/spamassassin -P -a:0*

Re: [SAtalk] RE: Trying to add my own custom test...

Hello Mitch, Thursday, September 18, 2003, 10:15:26 AM, you wrote: MW In my original post I'd asked if there was a way to whitelist or something - MW maybe consider this test authoritative if it succeeds - cut down on the MW effort - 80% of my mail is inter-client, about 20% outside - which is

Re: [SAtalk] Trouble getting spamd working with postfix

On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 07:52:59PM -0400, Larry Gilson wrote: Hi Alex, How are you reinjecting the mail into Postfix? Are you using Postfix's sendmail? Of course ! Is there an option? :) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek

Re: [SAtalk] Trouble getting spamd working with postfix

On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 12:56:57AM +, Jim wrote: On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 11:36:52PM +0200, Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote: argv=/usr/bin/spamc -x -e /usr/sbin/sendmail -i -f $sender $recipient Keep in mind this snippet from the spamc man page wrt '-e': Note that there is a

Re: [SAtalk] Trouble getting spamd working with postfix

On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:20:18PM +0200, Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote: I'm under the impression that using -x takes care of that. Incorrect? I don't think so. -x is a counter to -f which relates to being (un)able to connect to spamd -- not being (un)able to fork a child process to pipe the

[SAtalk] SpamC question

I need help from the dev team! In the docs for spamD, it has the following: ---cut--- When spamd receives a connection, it spawns a child to handle the request. The child will expect to read an email message from the network socket, which should then be closed for writing on the other end (so

Re: [SAtalk] does it work with solaries7?

On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Muhannad Tamemi spake: Thanks for answering . again please i need to be sure of sendmail version , i have sendmail 8.9.3 , does it work ??!! As long as you apply the appropriate patches to fix the multiple severe security holes known in this version, yes, it does. (But

Re: [SAtalk] mysql user-prefs script?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Farber wrote: The spamassassin mentions several times about a user-prefs script using mysql as a backend.. but the link to the spamassassin site does not list the file. It's in the sql/ directory when you expand the distribution tarball. rOD.